Well considering there’s still no absolute proof that he’s even alive, I think that would be quite a shock.

Well considering there’s still no absolute proof that he’s even alive, I think that would be quite a shock.

Well considering there’s still no absolute proof that he’s even alive, I think that would be quite a shock.

Well considering there’s still no absolute proof that he’s even alive, I think that would be quite a shock.

Yup, woke up with one yesterday and had one today too. What gives?

She seemed to me like she had a few screws loose. Followed her for a hot minute and that was long enough lol.

Update as of 11PM (EST) on 4/1.

This is not his account - someone using his name. Someone of his stature and integrity wouldn't post like he does. Be careful who you follow.

Right.👌

And the link to the article has a date of 2011.

Thank you! 😁👍

@doq what's the name of the song in that video? Love it!

Why would Trump allow this and push it as being safe? That, I don't get.

Nope. That was from 2019.

I was more referring to eveyone making something out of nothing with the formal SOTU. However, his excuse right now (based on what I read 20 mins ago) for not giving a speech isn't COVID but comcern that frimgw groups apparently want to blow them all up while he's doing so. Despite the heavy military presence and razor wire fences. Sounds legit lol.

Most presidents in recent history have not given a SOTU in their first year, including Trump. Biden likely won't either, but it's not a red flag issue although I totally agree that Biden has zero power.

President's typically always address a joint session in their first year, but it's not officially called a SOTU unless it's being called that by intent. This link provides some good info, but the bottom line is that it's nothing to make a big deal about and it means nothing on its face.

https://www.businessinsider.com/state-of-the-union-address-history-timeline-2019-1#there-has-not-been-a-state-of-the-union-address-every-year-several-presidents-did-not-give-official-speeches-in-this-capacity-in-their-first-year-reagan-in-1981-george-hw-bush-in-1989-clinton-in-1993-george-w-bush-in-2001-barack-obama-in-2009-and-donald-trump-in-2017-but-many-such-as-trump-did-deliver-speeches-to-congre

Regardless of whether Biden is actually president or not, my point is that this whole SOTU mystery isn't a mystery based on history.

Technically, he didn't give an official SOTU in 2017 - it was a public address before the joint session of Congress. Similar but formally not the same. His first official SOTU was in January of 2018.

As much as I thought this might be something worth talking about initially, it's not.

It's not uncommon for a president to forego the SOTU in the first year. Even Trump didn't give his first SOTU until January of 2018. Others include Reagan in 1981, George H.W. Bush in 1989, Clinton in 1993, George W. Bush in 2001, Barack Obama in 2009. But many, including Trump, did give speeches to Congress in their first year.

Do you have the source of where/what/who said this about the emails?

Dead! 🤣🤣🤣

She was found. The guy who took her was killed by police.

AMEN!!

Totally agree. All I hear is "just keep on blindly believeing without any actual verifiable proof...trust the plan...it looks like nothing is happenening because that's how it's supposed to look...people are dying and this circus comtinues because it's all for optics...in the meantime, let me add up this time stamp and draw arrows to this one from over here...it lines up with this date, on which nothing happens". Symbolism will be whose downfall? Trust what plan? I see nithing but more goalpost moving, and posts of red pandas which also mean nothing.

You echo many of my concerns. and the people who say that people have been executed and all this crazy crap is being done behind the scenes concern me. People follow Q because it's supposedly God-fearing humans working to disband the Cabal. Not because Q is God or vice-verse. It should go without saying that God is ultimately in charge. That's not the point here. The point is that if Q and "The Plan" are real, then there seems to be zero assurances but rather every indication that innocent people and patriots are on the losing end of this battle. And when you mention that, someone calls it "optics" and further gets me wondering who the real sheep are.

Based on what info? Theory?

So the percentage liklihood of death is higher with the vaccine than if you were to just get the virus??

That really is a killer delta, especially when you consider how foreign this likely sounded at the time (makes complete sense now, hence "future proves past"). The only thing that makes sense with these eerily accurate deltas is that they did use a time machine - which I admit sounds crazy lol. But what other explanation could there be besides a very accurate wild guess? Crazy.

I feel you, Porscha. I was thinking about how many times I've stocked-up on food. How many Friday's have come and gone. How many "booms" were anything but. Durham? Nothing. Weiner's laptop? Hunter's laptop? Nada. How many times has the goalpost moved? It's been moved so far and often that it's not even on the field or in the parking lot anymore lol. Hurry up and wait is all we do. I've got one foot out the door at this point.

Same here! I think they will all revisit use of the word "fight" from here on out!🤣