Whenever my wife and I go out and she has to use the restroom, I find myself having to keep an eye out to see who goes in there until she comes out.

I verified the claim of the gray checkmark myself and even compared it to other accounts and it is designated only for those serving in government, which Trump is not currently doing and so I do find this interesting which brings me to another item pertaining to the Brunson case which is now claiming that SCOTUS has not necessarily dismissed it as we have been made to believe.
https://x.com/argosaki/status/1855475017804656640?s=12

But beware as this may very well be fake news as I have not found anything to corroborate the claims of this item though I find it interesting that the Brunson case was once more brought to attention roughly two weeks before the check mark on Trump's X account turned gray. Whether there is any connection between this item and the gray checkmark remains to be seen.

But let us assume that the latest item pertaining to the Brunson case is true: If SCOTUS were to release a favorable ruling, we should expect a massive amount of electoral chaos to take pla

Oh but they seem to be able to connect with elephant behavior.

I don't know how anyone would have been able to have cloning technology 500 years ago, but the rest of it, I could see conceivably being the case.

Gee, I'd like to find out how they managed to conduct it from a laboratory located in China.

That still doesn't answer my question as to what version of the Talmud you found the verses you cited. There are two different versions that teach things different from one another.

That still does not answer my question. Again, can you tell me which version of the Talmud that you found the cited verses in?

There are two versions of the Talmud: There is the Jerusalem Talmud and then there is the Babylonian Talmud. In which version would I find the passages you cite? Which version would the cited protocols of Zion represent best?

Furthermore, Jesus never said the Jews were the were the synagogue of Satan; the passages you cite were directed first at the religious leaders (Jn. 8:44) and not to all of the people (that is made clear in v. 13 of the same chapter) and then to them who claimed to be Jews but were not:

"I know the blasphemy of them WHICH SAY they are Jews but ARE NOT, but are the synagogue of Satan." (Rev. 2:9

"Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan WHICH SAY they are Jews, and ARE NOT, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee." (Rev. 3:9)

That is a quite a difference between calling Jews the synagogue of Satan and calling those who CLAIM they are Jews but arenot the synagogue of Satan.

Can you prove that the individuals that I have listed share the same goals?

Not the goal of Jay Sekulow, Mark Levin, and others like-minded with them.

Hmmm. Pamella Geller is a Jew. Jay Sekulow is a Jew. Mark Levin is a Jew; all of whom ideologically and even theologically stand in opposition to the Jews you list.

Only if this turns out to be true as much as we might wish it to be and we will know soon enough if it is.

You're absolutely right. WE DO choose in whom we place our trust. We can either place our trust in God who is the supplier of all of our needs, as our national motto states, or we can place our trust in money which may be worth something today and worth nothing tomorrow.

We are at the point where this is what it takes but bear in mind that not only will we have to take our communities back from those brining terror death and destruction from them, but also from government enablers too. I hope these folks are prepared for that as well.

She's still on Truth Social, but hasn't posted there for three days.

Makes sense.

I'll feel better about the military controlling it when there is a change of leadership in the Pentagon and by force if necessary.

While in basic agreement with you, it is his deeds that make him a degenerate reprobate, not his DNA or that he is childless and unmarried.

We don't get to choose our DNA. We are born with it. There are a lot of childless men and women out there who would like to have children but can't (not necessarily their fault) and there are a lot of people out there unmarried who long for a loving and caring spouse who will stay with them and won't leave.

(Take into account that the unmarried are more likely to commit suicide than the married.)

What makes this man a degenerate reprobate is his spiritual and moral condition. Nothing more. If he undergoes a spiritual and moral transformation for the better and begins pursuing after righteousness instead of evil, then he will no longer be a degenerate reprobate regardless of his DNA, marital, or parental status.

Not enough space to go further but according to scripture, we are all born by nature reprobates but never beyond redempti

What if that's the drug that is also killing a lot of adults who have taken the vaccine as well?

Is he even on this platform?

Didn't that order expire at least two years ago?

Doesn't sound like anyone had a say in this at all.

Gag orders ought to be outlawed altogether.

What's the point of this?

Would be nice if there was documentation confirming this to be so.

Then show us what the passage says in the original.

Who cares whether he has a replica of the Lost Ark of the Covenant or not? It will be the finding of the real thing that will bring the most attention.

And yet somehow, a judge and jury found her to be credible.

After a careful review, this looks like a s*&t page to me and I am pretty sure that the person claiming to be Melania Trump, is NOT Melania Trump as I am sure she is not in the habit of spewing bull [crap] on social media.

It's great that she is zealous for her faith and that she wants to see people come to Christ. I've no desire to judge the intent of her heart, but there has got be a better way of going about that without posting the exact same message multiple times in a row.

It would be one thing if she posted thirteen different posts in a row; she would have a better chance at keeping her targeted audience engaged and she wouldn't arouse needless suspicion, but reposting the same message over and over again is a turn-off to Christians and non-Christians alike and not to mention, that is going to arouse suspicion not just from other users, but also from any administrators monitoring our activity here.