Is my intuition on this right? My sense is that we have been given a "box" (via Q) to play in as part of The Plan. We have had to learn our roles and their boundaries in a kind of osmotic process. We cannot be given direct and explicit orders, but that doesn't stop us forming a fully functioning militia in an information war. Our contribution is very real and meaningful, just it has to be aligned to the overall outcome.

The "box" keeps us from straying into areas that are unhelpful — so we don't hunt down anything about covert operational activities on our side or publicise then, for instance. We refrain from anything that could give the other side cause to paint us as violent or unlawful. We anchor this in the pursuit of equal justice under the rule of constitutional law, and leave many of our personal beliefs aside for that goal.

What is "in scope" and "out of scope" for the role of an anon?

Jesus is my Savior. Love my husband & America. Dog lover. RN. Constitutional conservative. Love Trump. Followed by Flynn on Twitter.

In response Martin Geddes to his Publication

At the core of all of this engagement is truth. It is truth that sets people free. This movement is all about revealing truth. Everyone truly involved for the betterment of society has a deep desire, IMO for understanding and sharing the truth. Each dedicated soul has their area of knowledge or expertise to share. It may be medical/ health issues ( this is one of mine) spiritual truth ( another of mine). Others have scientific, computer, research, financial, policy, laws, artistic, constitutional, military, etc. areas of expertise. These various areas of knowledge are shared and it all comes together in a beautiful tapestry woven together by each person contributing their individual gifts and talents. 😇

Only people mentioned by @JDuprayforhumanity in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Janet DuPre, click on at the bottom under it