😻 POTUS is so clever.
He’s tip-toeing us into a beautiful abundant new world.
NO TAXES ON TIPS
NO TAXES ON SOCIAL SECURITY
NO TAXES ON OVERTIME...... NO TAXES‼️🥳🎉

9-12-24 🦅🇺🇸🪖 President/CiC Trump, Tucson AZ
AS PART OF OUR ADDITIONAL TAX CUTS
WE WILL END ALL TAXES ON OVERTIME
Do you know what that means?
Think of that.
Think of that.
Think of that.
That gives people more of an incentive to work.
It’s a lot easier for companies to get people..
NO TAXES ON OVERTIME.
The people who work overtime are among
the hardest working citizens in our country
& for too long NO ONE IN WASHINGTON
has been looking out for them.
THEY’RE POLICE OFFICERS, NURSES, FACTORY WORKERS,
CONSTRUCTION WORKERS, TRUCK DRIVERS
& MACHINE OPERATORS.
It’s time for the working man & woman
to finally catch a break & this is a good one
& I think it’s going to be great for the country.
IF YOU’RE AN OVERTIME WORKER
WHEN YOU’RE PAST 40-HOURS
YOUR OVERTIME WILL BE TAX FREE ❤️

"Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord" Is1:18;

In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication

NUMEROUS IRS agents who have personally investigated and *verified* the claim that neither *wages* NOR *salary* paid for one's *labor* are in fact taxable *income* under IRS's own definition.

*Income* is by (IRS code) definition *profit* derived from *investments*

Filing the 1040 form and paying so-called 'income taxes' it deals with is *strictly VOLUNTARY*

In response wht 2.0 to his Publication

💯 wht
TAXES ARE UN-CONSTITUTIONAL‼️

🎥
🇺🇸 Peter Gibbons, Tax Attorney
“It’s actually very simple.
Congress tried to enact an income tax in 1894.
The Supreme Court said that it’s unconstitutional.
When SCOTUS says something is unconstitutional
IT’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL‼️
They tried again in 1913 & SCOTUS said
‘The 16th amendment conferred no new power of taxation.’
So if they didn’t have it then & they didn’t get it
THEY DON’T HAVE IT.
THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS
FOR ATTACKS ON THE WAGES OF AMERICANS
living & working in the 50-states of the Union. Period.”

🇺🇸 Tom Selgas, Tax Honesty
“I have a letter here from Daniel Inouye’s office
of the U.S. Senate that says…
‘THERE IS NO PROVISIONS WHICH SPECIFICALLY
& UNEQUIVOCALLY REQUIRE AN INDIVIDUAL
TO PAY AN INCOME TAX.’
Period. End of Story.
THERE IS NO LAW & TO DATE
NOBODY’S BEEN ABLE TO SHOW THERE IS A LAW….”

🇺🇸 @ ishjay1960

#TaxIsTHEFT

In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication

Yes! It is true that taxes are indeed unconstitutional, but you forget, the America its citizens believe ceased to exist after the assassination of Lincoln and the crowning of Washington DC as the new capital of U.S.A Inc. When the original capital was Philadelphia. The final nail in the coffin came in 1913 and in 1973 the dream ended.
Now it is time to rebirth the Nation!

In response Mystic Knight to his Publication

Indeed! And is is possible that the 14th Amendment United States Citizen alienated Americans from their Constitutional Rights? Who owns who? We The People do ordain and establish, creating Congress making Congress subject to the People. Congress created the 14A Citizen,,,,,soooooo, is the 14A Citizen subject to Congress? Is this the mess we find ourselves in? Is the birth certificate the contract? Can the contract be vitiated? Does this not create the perfect storm of corruption the Nation is in?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

It is a possibility that 14a is the anti human amendment, the birth certificate is the bill/lien of landing for a product with the parent(s) signature forfeiting said product and most likely the true reason single parent homes are desirable, it feeds the systems, jails, drugs, and the business' of death

You are on to something extremely important!!!

In response Mystic Knight to his Publication

My friend, you are the first response to multiple postings that had eyes to see. We Thee People must always stay in honor and AS-KING the quesrions? Was Jeopardy teaching us something in plain sight? What does an answer to a court secure? What is a UCC-1 filing? Is Reservation of Rights to the Constitution preserved when applied above a signature as Without Prejudice UCC 1-308? Does this signature vitiate an unconscionable contract?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

Does the surrender of goods at our birth condemn us in perpetuity? Did you place a signature on the contract? Were you given full disclosure? Did you provide unconditional informed consent? What is age of majority? (RESEARCH this one well, legal age is not lawful age) What does legal mean? What is the letter of the law? What does lawful mean? What is the spirit of the law? Is this the Spiritual war?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

Now, what is remedy?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

Did our creator give us Dominion over
L the land
A the air
W the water?
Did we forsake our rightful inheritance?
For lack of knowlege my people perish. Hoses 4:6

No God
No justice
Know God
Know justice

We The People endowed by our creator.

What is personhood?
What is a corporation?
Corpse (dead) oration (speaking)
Can man serve two masters?
Will he love one and hate the other?
What is free will if not choosing one master over the other?
What is the Golden Rule and how many words are in it?
What is code, policy, statues, ordinance and mandates, how many words? Is this the letter of the law?
Do corporations create these?
What is necromancy?
What is US Citizenship

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

Who created His people?
Who created the US citizen?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

AC/DC lyrics?
Who made who?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

Why are the powers that shouldn't be obsessed with identity?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

Is it to contract the confused into benefits and privileges? What comes with contracted benefits and privileges? Is it duties and obligations to perform? What happens when no reservation of rights is stated. Does the other party get to change the terms without your knowledge? Without your permission? Without your consent? Does this contract your free will away?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

Yes
Mental and Material servitude
Service to power
Loss of Independence and Identity
Yes, since the legal fiction is fictitious and therefore has no standing resulting in loss of "(Hue)man" rights aka Monster, which also applies to non binary and transgender(s) since they have forfeited their humanity willingly

In response Mystic Knight to his Publication

Again, why this system is so obsessed with man made categories called 'identity'?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

Identify is what it is given, "birth - certificate = license to motion SS card - Pneuma" it separates all activities, A license is required to motion, ID card, drivers license, fishing license, practice Law etc..
Knowledge of self is independence, no need for license since "YOU" can not be governed because you Live = Anima and breath = Pneuma,
They can only "handle" a corps and not a living "Being", they can not attach $ to Nature, only a product

In response Mystic Knight to his Publication

Correct
..all signature with UCC 1-308 Without Prejudice All Right Reserved. To be in the world not of the world?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

Yes,
Define signature
Define Prejudice
Define Reserved Rights
Who owns that Right?
Spiritual or Materia?

In response Mystic Knight to his Publication

Sign is a vibration?
Prejudice pre judge?
Reserved for His righteousness?
His Right?
Both?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

There two planes created, the Spiritual and the Material
Who are its governors?
Spiritual = Religion?
Material = (Maritime) LAW?
Legal fiction has no propensity, only servitude, work?

In response Mystic Knight to his Publication

Works without faith is dead?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

So vibration made manifest, material, land...and we were given Dominion over it, so we overstand in their courts?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

AS-KING and not answering the court, because Kings without subjects answer to their King only?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

Correct
A king without subjects has no courts (crown) jurisdiction,
Who gives the King power to govern? The people or ignorance of the people? Legal fiction has no propensity and therefore must be governed
"I could have freed more slaves if only they knew they were slaves" - Harriet Tubman

In response Mystic Knight to his Publication

She spoke truth on that one

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

A chosen one

In response Mystic Knight to his Publication

as we know our 'his story' is mostly lies

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

Yes, shameful really
If the masses knew who he truly was, to which he admitted to being, I doubt they'll understand or desire to know
Such a powerful and knowledgeable man and the only thing people want to do is fear him, instead of learning

well, mostly they go to bricks and mortar churches, 501 c 3, if a church needs permission from the state as a franchise, it certainly isn't of God. So what they teach is of the false one.

In response Mystic Knight to his Publication

Only people mentioned by @iam_lillyrose3 in this post can reply

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

I left mine in the early 90s, over some crazy crap, the easy one to flee from was the so called annulment. What a joke. Tried a couple others before walking away entirely and it wasn't until 11 years ago that Truth started manifesting in the inner sanctum for me. The true Temple.

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

for the first time, a verse made sense to me and has been unfolding ever since, speeding up now, really

(1) Show this thread