😻 POTUS is so clever.
He’s tip-toeing us into a beautiful abundant new world.
NO TAXES ON TIPS
NO TAXES ON SOCIAL SECURITY
NO TAXES ON OVERTIME...... NO TAXES‼️🥳🎉

9-12-24 🦅🇺🇸🪖 President/CiC Trump, Tucson AZ
AS PART OF OUR ADDITIONAL TAX CUTS
WE WILL END ALL TAXES ON OVERTIME
Do you know what that means?
Think of that.
Think of that.
Think of that.
That gives people more of an incentive to work.
It’s a lot easier for companies to get people..
NO TAXES ON OVERTIME.
The people who work overtime are among
the hardest working citizens in our country
& for too long NO ONE IN WASHINGTON
has been looking out for them.
THEY’RE POLICE OFFICERS, NURSES, FACTORY WORKERS,
CONSTRUCTION WORKERS, TRUCK DRIVERS
& MACHINE OPERATORS.
It’s time for the working man & woman
to finally catch a break & this is a good one
& I think it’s going to be great for the country.
IF YOU’RE AN OVERTIME WORKER
WHEN YOU’RE PAST 40-HOURS
YOUR OVERTIME WILL BE TAX FREE ❤️

"Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord" Is1:18;

In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication

NUMEROUS IRS agents who have personally investigated and *verified* the claim that neither *wages* NOR *salary* paid for one's *labor* are in fact taxable *income* under IRS's own definition.

*Income* is by (IRS code) definition *profit* derived from *investments*

Filing the 1040 form and paying so-called 'income taxes' it deals with is *strictly VOLUNTARY*

In response wht 2.0 to his Publication

💯 wht
TAXES ARE UN-CONSTITUTIONAL‼️

🎥
🇺🇸 Peter Gibbons, Tax Attorney
“It’s actually very simple.
Congress tried to enact an income tax in 1894.
The Supreme Court said that it’s unconstitutional.
When SCOTUS says something is unconstitutional
IT’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL‼️
They tried again in 1913 & SCOTUS said
‘The 16th amendment conferred no new power of taxation.’
So if they didn’t have it then & they didn’t get it
THEY DON’T HAVE IT.
THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS
FOR ATTACKS ON THE WAGES OF AMERICANS
living & working in the 50-states of the Union. Period.”

🇺🇸 Tom Selgas, Tax Honesty
“I have a letter here from Daniel Inouye’s office
of the U.S. Senate that says…
‘THERE IS NO PROVISIONS WHICH SPECIFICALLY
& UNEQUIVOCALLY REQUIRE AN INDIVIDUAL
TO PAY AN INCOME TAX.’
Period. End of Story.
THERE IS NO LAW & TO DATE
NOBODY’S BEEN ABLE TO SHOW THERE IS A LAW….”

🇺🇸 @ ishjay1960

#TaxIsTHEFT

In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication

Yes! It is true that taxes are indeed unconstitutional, but you forget, the America its citizens believe ceased to exist after the assassination of Lincoln and the crowning of Washington DC as the new capital of U.S.A Inc. When the original capital was Philadelphia. The final nail in the coffin came in 1913 and in 1973 the dream ended.
Now it is time to rebirth the Nation!

In response Mystic Knight to his Publication

Indeed! And is is possible that the 14th Amendment United States Citizen alienated Americans from their Constitutional Rights? Who owns who? We The People do ordain and establish, creating Congress making Congress subject to the People. Congress created the 14A Citizen,,,,,soooooo, is the 14A Citizen subject to Congress? Is this the mess we find ourselves in? Is the birth certificate the contract? Can the contract be vitiated? Does this not create the perfect storm of corruption the Nation is in?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

It is a possibility that 14a is the anti human amendment, the birth certificate is the bill/lien of landing for a product with the parent(s) signature forfeiting said product and most likely the true reason single parent homes are desirable, it feeds the systems, jails, drugs, and the business' of death

You are on to something extremely important!!!

In response Mystic Knight to his Publication

My friend, you are the first response to multiple postings that had eyes to see. We Thee People must always stay in honor and AS-KING the quesrions? Was Jeopardy teaching us something in plain sight? What does an answer to a court secure? What is a UCC-1 filing? Is Reservation of Rights to the Constitution preserved when applied above a signature as Without Prejudice UCC 1-308? Does this signature vitiate an unconscionable contract?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

Does the surrender of goods at our birth condemn us in perpetuity? Did you place a signature on the contract? Were you given full disclosure? Did you provide unconditional informed consent? What is age of majority? (RESEARCH this one well, legal age is not lawful age) What does legal mean? What is the letter of the law? What does lawful mean? What is the spirit of the law? Is this the Spiritual war?

In response Sue Kearns to her Publication

Yes it does since infant(s) do not have legal standing because it does not know of its rights and amendments, the (child) can not speak for itself and defence and the parent can not speak for the child because of independence, to do so is to admit the child is a ward and because the parent is ignorant of its own standing because it too has been signed away, parents has no standing, which explains as to why abortion is legal, parents sign away the Anima/Pneuma and replaced with the legal fiction aka the kid(s).

In response Mystic Knight to his Publication

The twist here is that the parents are enslaved without knowledge (what is US citizenship, what is personhood?) so are not competent to make the Right choice/decision for the minor child.

Only people mentioned by @MysticKnight in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Mystic Knight, click on at the bottom under it