Is my intuition on this right? My sense is that we have been given a "box" (via Q) to play in as part of The Plan. We have had to learn our roles and their boundaries in a kind of osmotic process. We cannot be given direct and explicit orders, but that doesn't stop us forming a fully functioning militia in an information war. Our contribution is very real and meaningful, just it has to be aligned to the overall outcome.

The "box" keeps us from straying into areas that are unhelpful — so we don't hunt down anything about covert operational activities on our side or publicise then, for instance. We refrain from anything that could give the other side cause to paint us as violent or unlawful. We anchor this in the pursuit of equal justice under the rule of constitutional law, and leave many of our personal beliefs aside for that goal.

What is "in scope" and "out of scope" for the role of an anon?

Taking the temperature of Anons is simple.
We went home and remained at peace as directed by DJT and our Christian values.
We expect the military to act and have trusted the plan.

But BE AWARE, if the traitorous Congress and their affiliates are not dealt with SOON, you will see American Patriots rising up to fight like you have NEVER SEEN.
No arbitrary scope or box will contain us.

In response Martin Geddes to his Publication

Only people mentioned by @JuliaB55 in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Julia Bradley, click on at the bottom under it