WWG1WGA🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 Kicked off twitter in the purge😏 Love to all patriots and the blind!

So, I’ve been on Truth social the past two days…Did I misunderstand…..I thought no censorship
2 examples here….someone related that (example) Lindsey graham was a pos. that statment was covered with a warning. Another, someone posted the child traffickers should be executed…that was also covered with a warning. I kind of understand the second because of the violence but the first one was ridiculous…
I would truly like anyones opinion. I understand that some restrictions are necessary or there could be really foul messages or pictures posted but I’m feeling that maybe TS might be taking it too far. Opinions Please
ThanQ

#FamilyIsEverything. APL = 5.65/10 *Authorized conspiracy theorist *Not an authorized preacher.

In response Quester215 ... to her Publication

They really need to be extra cautious. The Tech Co will be coming after them once they go desktop. They are playing by Apples rules right now because it's an app on their store. I do believe they will be adding some type of "Accept All" sensitive post in the future.

In response Vincent Kennedy⍟ to his Publication

as an example, this post I made calling out this Ali G loser got covered. I'm ok with that. worth it, he's a shill.

Missing my frens! Waiting for the plan to unfold!

In response The Rubber Duck ™️ to his Publication

“treasonous bastards” will get you the sensitive content warning 🤨 🤷🏼‍♀️

yes, it would. but that's not censorship, in my opinion. mostly because I understand the reason and what's at stake.

In response Sista Sue to her Publication

Only people mentioned by @TheRubberDuck in this post can reply

Missing my frens! Waiting for the plan to unfold!

In response The Rubber Duck ™️ to his Publication

I agree. I comprehend the reason behind it and I can live with it. I always open those posts though ☺️

In response Sista Sue to her Publication

cool. 😎

(1) Show this thread