I get that the vaxed shed spike protiens which could cause antibody reactions in those around them, but do they also shed nano particles?? Very curious

They’re calling it transfection since shedding refers to live viruses. Just so the nomenclature is clear according to the doctors. They are in the process of trying to figure that out. But they’re small enough to come out of bodily fluids just as a spike proteins are. The spike protein is the bio weapon by the way.

this is the part that I am trying to understand better: if the spike protein is the bioweapon, then is the “vaccination” the correct response to a bio attack? or is there evidence that both the virus and tthe “vaccines” all do harm?

The virus itself is actually pretty innocuous. We have all been exposed to coronavirus is all throughout our life. They Weaponized it. And not everybody got exposed that Weaponized one. That is my understanding. Now as far as the injection, which is not a vaccine, and the spike protein is the bio weapon. The spike protein that is on the coronavirus as well as the bio weapon. That is what causes harm to the body.

Should’ve proofread that before I hit publish. The spike protein is the bio weapon. listen to interviews with Dr. Carrie Madej, Dr. Lee Merritt, Dr. Larry Palevsky, Dr. Tenpenny

thank you. i understand that the injection is a genetic therapy, not a vaccine, which is why i put it in quotes. does the genetic therapy expose a person to the spike protein or protect against it? this is where there is conflicting info. lots of people assuming there is bad stuff add to the injection but without references. i do not make fear based decisions, so for me the only reason to consider the jab is to protect against a bio attack. need more info. thanks for the references. links welcome.