Service to Other. Teacher/Learner. Here to help with the Great Awakening.
New Research Shocks Scientists: Human Emotion Physically Shapes Reality!
https://www.lifecoachcode.com/2017/02/26/emotion-shapes-reality/?fbclid=IwAR1rdykeQ643nnZLIPYCMnRrOo-G4II1cF5ok5BEqEkmZGNjiBcQWRd6xMA
Dear sweet mother of all that is sacred! do you guys ever "test and approve" your resources because this is abysmal at best! Nowhere are you told who performed the study, where it was performed and what was their methodology? Was the experiment replicated by other researchers with predictable outcomes given said methodology? THEY DONT TELL YOU WHO, WHAT, WHERE AND HOW! Doesnt that concern anyone? And if anyone attempts to say science cant be trusted needs to pump the breaks... we shouldnt trust bad science but this cant wvwn bw considered bad science. These are just statements, nothing more.
Service to Other. Teacher/Learner. Here to help with the Great Awakening.
Try this on for detail. Cell biologist Glen Rein … and IHM Research Director Rollin McCraty conducted a series of experiments in the early 1990s involving DNA and intentionally generated emotions. A decade later interest in these experiments persisted. After numerous requests, McCraty summarized their data and published the results of the research in 2003 in a brief report titled Modulation of DNA Conformation by Heart-Focused Intention.
There has been a correlation between mood/emotions and physical health since the Pre-Socratics. I appreciate that you at least provide an actual study but clearly did not read the article dis you? The article claims that our emotions reform objective reality and alter the objective world around us without evidence. a direct quote states, “Human emotion shapes reality...not just our emotions but reality itself”! That is in the first paragraph... didn't make it that far? Read the article then read my comment in context!
Service to Other. Teacher/Learner. Here to help with the Great Awakening.
Yes, I did read the article. I agree it should have been sited.
I will continue to look for the actual science.
Have you reviewed the Princeton PEAR Research?
Or simply wave / partical duality research. There is lots of evidence that our consciousness changes our physical reality.
Additionally, the fact that people doing research and why they conduct the research is of no consequence to me. There is no way one could measure or prove objective realities submission to human emotion. Not in a million years A person with a good attitude will undoubtedly have a better life. internal energy and its influence on the self has been demonstrated. Viktor Frankl and Logos Therapy is an example of what I am referring to. "Mans Search for Meaning" is a seminal work here. But that is not suggesting
objective realities subordination to whether I am happy. Its pure idiocy.
Service to Other. Teacher/Learner. Here to help with the Great Awakening.
People who say things like 'there is no way'... Have a limited reality. Period. I hope you choose one day to expand your thinking. Why not take some time and actually study Princeton PEAR. Try thinking about wave particle duality in other terms. The proof is right in front of you. Perhaps it is your limiting beliefs that prevent you from seeing.
by the way, still waiting for you to deal with any of the reasons I provided. Not suprised. A fools religion tends to be devoid of anything more than a strong stock of emotions and gentle pats on the shoulder. The only way for such an idea to be true, that emotions or internal energy has the causal power to effectuate change in objective reality, is if objective reality is illusory and only the mind exists... Solipsism! You can take your time to research and respond but if you have nothing to offer by way of a defeater or scientific refutation, please take a seat and bow out graciously!
Service to Other. Teacher/Learner. Here to help with the Great Awakening.
Again I would suggest you research the 20 years of hard science conducted at Princeton University wrt Mind/Emotion Machine Interactions. The project was called PEAR (princeton Experimental anomylies research).
Below is the link to the science from the article. Enjoy.
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/mistic/esp_greggbraden_11.htm
Intersectionality has an even longer tradition rooted in the post-modern assertions of Nietzsche and the deconstruction of language... doesnt make it true. there are countless articles, dissertaions and books written in the subject but Inwasnt aware that was the sufficient condition for truth! Voluminous research demands belief? Man, we should strip Einstein of his Nobel proze for physics since his theory on electromagnetism was contrary to amount of research done prior of which he cntradicted. what you need to figure out is that research is not the same as truth.
