Service to Other. Teacher/Learner. Here to help with the Great Awakening.
New Research Shocks Scientists: Human Emotion Physically Shapes Reality!
https://www.lifecoachcode.com/2017/02/26/emotion-shapes-reality/?fbclid=IwAR1rdykeQ643nnZLIPYCMnRrOo-G4II1cF5ok5BEqEkmZGNjiBcQWRd6xMA
Dear sweet mother of all that is sacred! do you guys ever "test and approve" your resources because this is abysmal at best! Nowhere are you told who performed the study, where it was performed and what was their methodology? Was the experiment replicated by other researchers with predictable outcomes given said methodology? THEY DONT TELL YOU WHO, WHAT, WHERE AND HOW! Doesnt that concern anyone? And if anyone attempts to say science cant be trusted needs to pump the breaks... we shouldnt trust bad science but this cant wvwn bw considered bad science. These are just statements, nothing more.
Service to Other. Teacher/Learner. Here to help with the Great Awakening.
Try this on for detail. Cell biologist Glen Rein … and IHM Research Director Rollin McCraty conducted a series of experiments in the early 1990s involving DNA and intentionally generated emotions. A decade later interest in these experiments persisted. After numerous requests, McCraty summarized their data and published the results of the research in 2003 in a brief report titled Modulation of DNA Conformation by Heart-Focused Intention.
There has been a correlation between mood/emotions and physical health since the Pre-Socratics. I appreciate that you at least provide an actual study but clearly did not read the article dis you? The article claims that our emotions reform objective reality and alter the objective world around us without evidence. a direct quote states, “Human emotion shapes reality...not just our emotions but reality itself”! That is in the first paragraph... didn't make it that far? Read the article then read my comment in context!
Service to Other. Teacher/Learner. Here to help with the Great Awakening.
Yes, I did read the article. I agree it should have been sited.
I will continue to look for the actual science.
Have you reviewed the Princeton PEAR Research?
Or simply wave / partical duality research. There is lots of evidence that our consciousness changes our physical reality.
Additionally, the fact that people doing research and why they conduct the research is of no consequence to me. There is no way one could measure or prove objective realities submission to human emotion. Not in a million years A person with a good attitude will undoubtedly have a better life. internal energy and its influence on the self has been demonstrated. Viktor Frankl and Logos Therapy is an example of what I am referring to. "Mans Search for Meaning" is a seminal work here. But that is not suggesting
objective realities subordination to whether I am happy. Its pure idiocy.
Service to Other. Teacher/Learner. Here to help with the Great Awakening.
People who say things like 'there is no way'... Have a limited reality. Period. I hope you choose one day to expand your thinking. Why not take some time and actually study Princeton PEAR. Try thinking about wave particle duality in other terms. The proof is right in front of you. Perhaps it is your limiting beliefs that prevent you from seeing.
by the way, still waiting for you to deal with any of the reasons I provided. Not suprised. A fools religion tends to be devoid of anything more than a strong stock of emotions and gentle pats on the shoulder. The only way for such an idea to be true, that emotions or internal energy has the causal power to effectuate change in objective reality, is if objective reality is illusory and only the mind exists... Solipsism! You can take your time to research and respond but if you have nothing to offer by way of a defeater or scientific refutation, please take a seat and bow out graciously!
Service to Other. Teacher/Learner. Here to help with the Great Awakening.
There is a difference between skeptical and synical.
You seem like an angry person just calling others names, in an effort to maintain your beliefs.
Perhaps you should examine your own perspective.
Did you even look at the items I suggested? Probably not because both of those items have science in spades. Wave particle duality, Princeton PEAR reseach. Or dont look and keep to you synical name calling behaviours. It bothers me not.
I did look. I have been searching for a peer reviewed study on their research and guess what I found..... absolutely nothing. I was utterly shocked. Wired magazine sure liked the idea haha! If that is the basis for your belief then I have nothing for you. My mannerisms are one of incredulity and not of anger. Its just shocking that such speculative “research” is the basis for such confident assertions. But because it’s Princeton, we gotta listen because they would have no vested interest to assert spurious theories. What would be interesting is to see when this research team was given a grant
I suppose you believe there is not enough published research on Wave partical duality... When light is observed it take one form if not it takes another.... The difference is conscious observation. That is hard science that consciousness changes reality. Believe as you like. You are simply not thinking critically. You have also trapped your growth by bleiving these things impossible and foolish. I feel sorry for you.
I also trapped my growth in the idea I am capable of living under water without an artificial form of oxygen. You will come to find out that the very act of maintaining a conviction is by definition disbelieving in all counterfactuals. It was Plato who said that a wise man can entertain an idea without adopting it. with you, if I dont entertain and adopt then I am a fool. I choose Plato. No offense but there are credible reasons for doing so. Heres an experiment for you, get in your car, put the key in the ignition and try with all your might to start the car with your mind haha! Good luck
Wow... thats not what I am saying. wave particle theory is well researched since the advent of quantum mechanics and even earlier. That isnt what I am talking about... not at all actually. Because a couple of researchers P Hack data on Wave Duality and have some baseless correlation to its causal effect on the exeternal world we should build an alter to the theory? I dont think you understand what you are saying. Light being a wave and a particle has zero evidential import to the idea that Human emotions can "affect machines" By the way, thats from the study in case you were wondering.
Service to Other. Teacher/Learner. Here to help with the Great Awakening.
If you were to actually read the Princeton PEAR research, Jans tried to get his work published. He was blacklisted from publication and they could site no fault with his data. That was a battle he fought for decades. To my knowledge no one has faulted his research. This is a Princeton University Doctor, not some guy in his garage. He spent 20 years on this. Now, it is believed that in they 80's the US government realized that the ufo/space craft they had, were controlled by conscious thought. Jans was the only researcher in the world working on mind machine interaction.
Service to Other. Teacher/Learner. Here to help with the Great Awakening.
Many believe his research was not published for 'national security concerns' related to the conscious controll of the recovered UFO's. The 20 years of research is clear and compelling. It deals with both Emotion and Conscious effects on machines and reality. There is more going on here than you know. Supression of some of these subjects I believe is also real and serves a purpose for the military industrial complex.
