There are moments when I see the breathtaking level of disclosure happening on AU, and wonder at the minuscule audience who can appreciate what they are seeing. Armies of academics, journalists, and researchers who couldn’t recognise a diamond if it fell from the sky right in front of a jewellery shop window in a box labelled “mystery precious stone”. They have no curiosity and no ability to accept oblique communications from unofficial sources. One quick search on a database for published papers, and no results means it doesn’t exist, even if they hold it in their hand. Future historians will comb over the AU archive and marvel at what went on here. There are disclosure ops all over the place, but this looks like the premier one. Significance way beyond its size. And being AU, I will never write an article about it. The price of membership is discretion about who you invite in.

The first rule of AU…don’t talk about AU! 🤣🤣🤣

It’s strange, but I’ve always felt guarded about AU. Not protective. Just a sort of knowing that others wouldn’t get it.

Some people take things so literally and don’t appreciate the nuances. It makes it hard to explain. I’ve found it easier to just stay quiet.

I’m pretty sure that there are people here who are pretty close to my location, geographically speaking. And it’s not to say that some who are savvy haven’t figured it out. I just can’t bring myself to step out into the open.

Having been a targeted individual from birth, I tend to feel more secure if I’m not blasting it out there. I know THEY know where I am. I just don’t understand why I’m so interesting to THEM.

All that to say. I’m not interested in dragging more people in and putting others at risk.

Those that need to be here. Will be here.

In response Martin Geddes to his Publication

Only people mentioned by @Anatated in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Ana Tate, click on at the bottom under it