The knowledge frontier of the war for anons comprises a diffuse network of plausibly deniable sources plus whistleblowers. The latter can be cited as evidence, but the former require intuition to evaluate, which cannot easily be conveyed.

There is a lot of information that pushes the boundary of what is conceivable, but that is a matter of your constraints to belief due to cultural programming, not what is ultimately true. Sacred texts from other cultures seem to be some of the best ways to cross-check what we are told about the cosmos, life, this realm, and hidden forces.

Writing about these subjects is hard as it is so speculative. You can’t conduct simple experiments to test out reincarnation, for instance. Civilisations in higher dimensions may exist, but how to go there for a consciousness tourist break? Even basic stuff around electromagnetism isn’t my field of expertise. I might be discerning, yet still dumb from ignorance.

If it is of any help, I work a bit around the electromagnetism, and still feel dumb from ignorance πŸ˜ƒ I guess I'd need to repeat the early tests of 1800s to truly get the hang of it.

Clown world special is this: your work is designed to drain any and all interest of doing something like that outside of the work place. If you are a photographer, you rarely go for photographing outside of work. If you handle lots of numeric data at work, the last thing you'll notice is... πŸ˜„

In response Martin Geddes to his Publication

Only people mentioned by @MichaelMerrier in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Michael Merrier, click on at the bottom under it