To some degree yes, perhaps. However, I caution all to continue practicing discernment. When I see anons spouting narrative soundbites that are dictated to them just as I see the sleeping normies spouting theirs, it gives me pause. Further, I find many of the endorsements made for medical choices and also with certain candidates difficult to stomach and find the "optics" excuse just isn't holding water.

On a separate note - while the SCOTUS Roe v. Wade decision seems wonderful and anons were shouting victory, of course it doesn't end it, just kicks those choices to the states. This could rile up the middle ground independents who now may be more cautious of contributing to the red tsunami at midterms.