As far as I can tell with my limited understanding and resources, the Q process is designed to be non-violent towards anons. By that I mean we're "necessarily and tolerable and openly disinfo'd" — but we aren't being used in a way that creates material gain for those behind the scenes. We are invited to contribute, but there is no coercion. There are some "tiny traps" to teach us vital lessons (like don't predict dates) but that's done in our (individual and collective) best interest.
I don't mind being used by Q-Team
to unknowingly post DISINFO.
Juan O Savin said there are double & TRIPLE agents
in this INFORMATION WAR.
The great Patriot, Admiral Rogers, 17th Director of the NSA,
flipped on the Obama camp.
After President Trump won the 2016 Election
Rogers went to Trump Tower
& showed the President-Elect he was being spied on
even in his SCIF.
#3389
Why did Rogers visit POTUS @ TT w/o authorization
shortly after a SCIF was installed?..
Why did POTUS move his transition command center
(base of ops) from TT the VERY NEXT DAY?
🇺🇸 In 1961, when JFK outlined the DS
that there existed "a monolithic & ruthless conspiracy
that relies primarily on covert means
for expanding its sphere of influence...
Infiltration
Subversion
Intimidation
Guerrillas by night"
JFK was also outlining HOW to defeat them.
By using THEIR tactics against them.
GENIUS.
Who is Musk for instance?
War by other means
& Anons are part of The Plan to win it 🐸
