Doing my part in helping restore freedom to America while kicking evil in the ass. Guided by God the Father, Jesus Christ & my ancestors!

Juan o Savin is not JFK Jr and never claimed to be. He’s a Navy guy that has done a lot of work for the Kennedy Family.

I listen, watch, wait, and weigh. I base my judgments on God, gut, and grammar. Language and patterns show you what you need to know.

In response Doq Holliday to his Publication

Juan would have to show himself to be OTHER than John Kennedy (the son). His book, "Kid by the Side of the Road", a very compelling part of the movie, The Called, where he goes to Dallas to the site of where his father was shot, walks by the drainage hole from whence one of the bullets was shot, shows a "ghost" of his teenage self in 4 different scenes of that Dallas segment.

I may be interpreting it incorrectly, but the "ghost" represented John who, as an older teenager, finally came to grips with just what had happened to his father.

When David Nino Rodriguez interviews him, he always calls him "Juanito" (little John).

Juan said he was friends with Bill Cooper. Why would Cooper wait until October of 1999 (a full four months after the plane crash) to talk about JFJ Jr. "murder" and the media coverup?

I believe it's John until proven otherwise.

I do agree with you that he's never claimed to be JFK Jr.

In response Jan Jackson * * * to her Publication

He is not Jr, his face was shown accidently in one of his interviews.

I listen, watch, wait, and weigh. I base my judgments on God, gut, and grammar. Language and patterns show you what you need to know.

I didn't see that interview. Do you know whose face it was?

In response Jan Jackson * * * to her Publication

Only people mentioned by @Direwolf in this post can reply

I listen, watch, wait, and weigh. I base my judgments on God, gut, and grammar. Language and patterns show you what you need to know.

I listen, watch, wait, and weigh. I base my judgments on God, gut, and grammar. Language and patterns show you what you need to know.

I watched the video you referenced. Here's what I observed:
1. The ENTIRE TIME I saw this guy's face even when TWO OTHER PEOPLE were having a back and forth conversation.
2. I looked up Wayne Ronald Willott on bing.com - found an image that showed this guy here in car (I will post it here) which says Wayne Ronald Willott is a fraud.
3. I clicked on the picture and it took me to P.J. 777's Anonup post.

Conclusions:
1. This Wayne guy was LISTENING to a Juan O Savin interview in his car.
2. The person who posted your video is not a credible person and gives no concrete, plausible evidence.
3. I have known for quite a while that P.J. 777 is one of the MOST RELIABLE Anons in existence. How coincidental that the "Wayne Ronald Willott is a fraud" picture took me to P.J. 777's Anonup post.
4. Seemingly unimportant but more important than one might think: grammar is KEY. The title of your video is extremely bad grammar; I can't even make out what the person is trying to convey. D