Supreme Court has ruled that vaccinated people are now products/patented goods, and according to US law, no longer human
https://t.me/ShellShQck/2419
https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf
without a page and paragraph indicated,,,,, just saying, they may not have read it correctly
one world undivided with liberty and justice for all https://twitter.com/verndewd https://www.bitchute.com/channel/UnlManuURgPw/
been removed.” Brief for Petitioners 49. They nevertheless argue that cDNA is not patent eligible because “[t]he
nucleotide sequence of cDNA is dictated by nature, not by
the lab technician.” Id., at 51. That may be so, but the lab
technician unquestionably creates something new when
cDNA is made. cDNA retains the naturally occurring
exons of DNA, but it is distinct from the DNA from which
it was derived. As a result, cDNA is not a “product of
nature” and is patent eligible under §101, except insofar
as very short series of DNA may have no intervening
introns to remove when creating cDNA. In that situation,
a short strand of cDNA may be indistinguishable from
natural DNA.9///// page 17
