Supreme Court has ruled that vaccinated people are now products/patented goods, and according to US law, no longer human
https://t.me/ShellShQck/2419

https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf

Only people mentioned by @navalkishori in this post can reply

In response naval kishori Z to her Publication

BS!!
This lie is said of clones as well.
Nope!!
Wrong!!

In response naval kishori Z to her Publication

If they live long enough 😥🤢😱😡

In response Beirie Rose to her Publication

This bullshit needs to stop. This grifting propaganda site is intentionally misrepresenting data to send a wrong message.

Both VAERS and EudraVigilance do not "show" vaccine related deaths as the article claims. These platforms are reporting tools to find out IF sickness and deaths that occurred are related to vaccinations that happened prior.

People die. All the time. Some of those who died happen to have received the vaccine weeks or months prior. Some of those who died happen to have started driving a different route to work, maybe.

These reporting tools exist to collect data that will later help to find out if more people die a certain way than another, and if they do, to then determine if that external factor had a part in that death, or not.

And only IF that link is established it makes sense to say those people died of the vaccine. But that isn't what VAERS and co. do.

They just collect the reports for further analysis. They don't "show" a damn thing.

In response Beirie Rose to her Publication

Oh and also, Trump is on the record recommending the J&J vaccine, and has gotten it himself.

(3) Show this thread
In response naval kishori Z to her Publication

Every day new content is hidden all over this website...
DRAG & HOLD your cursor over ALL empty white spaces ON EVERY PAGE... There is so much info here it is amazing... Also CLICK every RED PERIOD at the end of a sentence you find... This Rabbit Hole is VERY DEEP...😁💪

https://www.ingersolllockwood.com/the-great-reset-update-if-you-take-a-covid-19-vaccine-are-you-now-patented-chattel-and-do-you-lose-your-human-rights/

In response Jon Pritchard to his Publication

thank you , God bless

In response Jon Pritchard to his Publication

how you find this page and is it a white hats or opposite ?

(2) Show this thread

Protect 1st & 2nd Amendment, Protect Children, Save America, Let Freedom Ring, United We Stand, We The People

In response naval kishori Z to her Publication

false narrative to call people transhuman, and is flawed reasoning by supreme court. supreme court cannot determine if someone has a soul. cannot patent a soul, supremes are idiots.

In response CM_ Patriot to his Publication

Yes , very good argument , thanks

In response CM_ Patriot to his Publication

Soul is unteachable , always pure in is form and eternal , we can say we are not this body , the soul travels from an old body to a new one like from an old cloth to a new one , reincarnation

(2) Show this thread

one world undivided with liberty and justice for all https://twitter.com/verndewd https://www.bitchute.com/channel/UnlManuURgPw/

In response naval kishori Z to her Publication

been removed.” Brief for Petitioners 49. They nevertheless argue that cDNA is not patent eligible because “[t]he
nucleotide sequence of cDNA is dictated by nature, not by
the lab technician.” Id., at 51. That may be so, but the lab
technician unquestionably creates something new when
cDNA is made. cDNA retains the naturally occurring
exons of DNA, but it is distinct from the DNA from which
it was derived. As a result, cDNA is not a “product of
nature” and is patent eligible under §101, except insofar
as very short series of DNA may have no intervening
introns to remove when creating cDNA. In that situation,
a short strand of cDNA may be indistinguishable from
natural DNA.9 ///page 17

one world undivided with liberty and justice for all https://twitter.com/verndewd https://www.bitchute.com/channel/UnlManuURgPw/

In response naval kishori Z to her Publication

without a page and paragraph indicated,,,,, just saying, they may not have read it correctly

In response vernon nielsen to his Publication

I have to read , maybe

(1) Show this thread