Here, from one of the many times I had to dissect this:
The fires on the left and the pictures on the right are not related.
First image on the right is a long term exposure of a Falcon 9 start. Second one is a screenshot from a video of a meteorite in Michigan in 2018, third one is a lens flare from a dirty lens. Details on the last one linked below, the other two can be looked up easily.
The plane (Boeing YAL-1) was meant for rocket defense and scrapped in 2014.
https://twitter.com/MickWest/status/1031971461102067713?s=20
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-xhTJjCpdU
THIS is real, no doubt.
The picture is still made up.
Also the existence of patents has no meaning in of itself, but that's a topic for another day.
OH good Lord, are you trying to insinuate chemtrails, which I knew about prenet are not real. lol Come on, thanks for your input on the pics though.
Please don't put words in my mouth.
What I wrote means exactly that and no more. Patents are not proof for anything. Patents serve a purpose, and that purpose is not to prove existence or practicability of technology. So please don't conflate it as such.
I probably knew more thirty years ago then you know now. Keep digging.
Where does that accusation even come from? Are we having the same conversation?