Just a guy trying to connect the dots.

In response Kim Runner to her Publication

“Consider the vastness of space.”

Be always yourself, because there are others already enough!

In response Cowboy w2b to his Publication

This statement of Q is probably less based on knowledge, but more opinion of highest classification. One derives the probable from the obvious (Occam's Razor). From this follows that in the vastness of the universe other life must exist inevitably. In the framework to secure the people, this must not be under-implified, no matter what one thinks to know and understand. There must be a safeguard advance.

From my perspective, of course, this assumption of other peoples in space is not wrong. This can be clearly deduced, especially from circumstances on earth. But in my opinion the human being marked by religion is not so fast able to accept the reality like the universe really ticks. Man will not be ready so fast to give up his fairy tale figures.

Above ground in Freeattle, Chyna

In response Đёṿid Krístāni to his Publication

or vice versa

It's difficult, because the universe works differently in decisive aspects. For example, here one considers time as a quantity of certain statics. But it is a variable, relative to its reference. Epochal time like yesterday, today, tomorrow has a completely different context, it is imaginary. In the entropic universe a journey on this level is not possible. There is no existential yesterday to which one could move. However, the universe offers a small exception, but this cannot really be called a journey. There would be no going back. Moebius understood it.

Of course, some people already cope with the changes, because they were and are always open to all sides. But that makes up only a very small percentage. It remains to be seen, because what defines every life in the universe is its togetherness in times of crisis. Perhaps the human being surprises by a social form which he was not ready to live up to now because he did not think it for possible. 🌱

In response lil zesquo to his Publication

Only people mentioned by @loichtfoier in this post can reply

Above ground in Freeattle, Chyna

In response Đёṿid Krístāni to his Publication

true. the quantum effect could cause many "time lines." but if there is an end to the universe as some "scientists" think then there is a begining and an end. the past present and future happen simultaneously. time is a man made construct. there might only be the "now."

Be always yourself, because there are others already enough!

In response lil zesquo to his Publication

It's difficult as clarified. One lets irritate generally by long established theorems they are really true in this way. In reality there are no different time lines. This thought is based only on the consideration of several universes. In its structure one is already overwhelmed with this single one. From which one deduces on the basis of a simple observation it would have only a certain short age. Thereby it is with no technique ascertainable which time factor it has already really needed. Non-locally one assumes very high exponents. Whereby the question itself is completely irrelevant. Also the thought of the simultaneity is wrong here. Many forget that this is also just a theorem which excludes the existing construct of the universe. Some hear here and there something and throw everything into one pot. Then, for example, so unrealistic views of wormholes arise, which would lead into existential pasts. An alteration according to Moebius clarifies time as a factor of the status quo.

(1) Show this thread