WHERE ARE THEY NOW?

I must point out what they did not show was the measurements on the second photo. If you apply that same rule you will see that the foot is almost as long as the the tape of his face by comparison. Also the size of the leg looks at least 3x as long using that same scale. It is the same trick that is used in films to make objects look much smaller than they actually are. Not to mention I have never seen a child with a toenail that thick. I do not doubt what this claims but IMO this is not proof of it.

I agree. Photography is a 2 dimensional form and can be deceptive on purpose. But to be honest, that looks like a kid's leg, maybe Asian.

Put your focus on the center picture and ignore the one to the right. Does it still look small? I block the right picture out so I could only see the center one and it actually grew and looked like a smaller woman but a woman and not a child. It is that preconceived notion that the article puts in your head that really sets it up. I had to look at pictures of legs, as weird as that sounds, to get a different perspective of all round size. The things we do...sigh.

What he's doing to that woman or child is creepy as heck.
BTW, is that you, Quentin? jk

Oh no. Don't get me wrong, most of Hollywood belong in the ground. I just see so many stories that a just put out that are fake but are not questioned. This could all be my perspective and it very well could be wrong but at least it will get minds wondering. This is important because we do not want to get so caught up we convict the innocent. If we can be impartial to those we believe to be guilty than we will be able to see true innocence when it stands before us.