I must point out what they did not show was the measurements on the second photo. If you apply that same rule you will see that the foot is almost as long as the the tape of his face by comparison. Also the size of the leg looks at least 3x as long using that same scale. It is the same trick that is used in films to make objects look much smaller than they actually are. Not to mention I have never seen a child with a toenail that thick. I do not doubt what this claims but IMO this is not proof of it.
I agree. Photography is a 2 dimensional form and can be deceptive on purpose. But to be honest, that looks like a kid's leg, maybe Asian.
Love can build a bridge. Looking for individuals to help with construction. Contact your local We are ready centers to join.
Put your focus on the center picture and ignore the one to the right. Does it still look small? I block the right picture out so I could only see the center one and it actually grew and looked like a smaller woman but a woman and not a child. It is that preconceived notion that the article puts in your head that really sets it up. I had to look at pictures of legs, as weird as that sounds, to get a different perspective of all round size. The things we do...sigh.