Good grief! Come on, people, are we after truth or not? Ignoring truth assures dying in darkness. If you insist on being Eloi the Morlocks are going to eat you alive.

No, Tesla was not a Flat Earther, though he did believe in the Akashic Record and, perhaps, aliens. The autor of that statement is Darrell Fox, as he makes clear on FaceBook where he 1st posted it. The actual article by Tesla mentions the "globe" numerous times (quotes in the article linked).

Misquotes of Nikola Tesla
https://flatearth.ws/tesla-misquote

Tesla WAS involved in Operation High Jump. I have with my own eyes read the entry in an old encyclopedia for the "firmament" & it gave the measured angle it rose up from the land at. I do agree that the statement likely a misquote & have also read that, but also true that most ALL of history has been altered in literature. The Bible has more books missing than still present, & what is still here has even had slight alterations from my now deceased Grandmother-in-law's Bible to the time mine was printed 50+ years after hers was & BOTH are supposedly KJV authorized editions. Former minister & do indeed know the book. Also, I study the changes in science "after" the import of 1600 Nazi scientists to the US following WWII and the beginning of Consensus Science followed that. Empirical Science/Scientists were methodically erased/obscured after that. No one knows for sure the real truth at all, NO ONE, period. ALL that we know is a lie now, all of it. Be kind, not divisive is all I ask.

Is God truth? Is God Almighty? Do you really think He'd allow the message of His Word to be corrupted? I ask because you say you're a minister.

There are written records in their own hand by original writers like Tesla and our Founding Fathers, they're not destroyed, just ignored. It's easy to pervert what's allowed to be covered in dust.

The Bible has original writings and any honorable Biblical scholar who composes a modern version of The Bible, refers back to the oldest known extant texts in their original languages and translates, some NT texts are within 20 yrs or less of Jesus' crucifixion. The Dead Sea Scrolls, from a time before Jesus, certify the Torah and other OT books as being almost identical to modern translations.

It's dangerous to say, "It's all lies, so who can know the truth?" If you want to know the truth, pray God leads you, then search for it. It's not all lies, but the one whispering that to you is.

#JesusisLord
#GodWins!

!) Was a minister, and not a preacher or ordained and not currently. Ordained=licensed by man, I don't feel is necessary. Ministering is a dangerous position, for whom much is given much will be asked and those who teach get judged by an entirely different measure. There are definitely without any doubt MANY books hidden/removed/no longer included. And the books we have today were indeed "modified" to remove much of what could hint at rebellion or standing against the organized Church. To understand the real original you have to seek out the FIRST texts and use linear translations into English for that. The KJV is NOT the original, and the bearing of the KING JAMES "VERSION" in the title reflects that. There were 58 miles of shelving of non-dicslosed writings under the Vatican=hidden/removed from public access. ALL of history is indeed modified/changed even what we read as "The" Bible in any version...versions are "versions" and not original wordings but many times over translations

We have a close version but not at all the true original and unspoiled renditions of the founding stories that make up the book in whole nor ALL of it. I NEVER said all the Bible is all lies...you did. I said ALL HISTORY is modified, it is indeed mostly filled with lies so please read back and understand/clarify that. I said what we were handed down was included with "changes" not all-out lies. Careful, you are falsely accusing me of something I never said. I could also say "who is the chief accusor"? if you stand in accusation & judgment like that who is whispering to you? I have decades in this area, I am over 50 and started when I was in my late 20's with this. No one is "whispering" to me...take care in your replies, please.

I also never claimed them as destroyed...again YOUR words. it is there to read back for yourself. Slow down...and take a breath, and don't get heated with quick responses without reading more carefully you are misquoting me and grossly in areas with that response.

"Good grief" comes across wrong...as you opened with that I originally responded to. NO ONE knows the whole truth, not me or YOU either...that is fact.

"Empirical Science/Scientists were methodically erased/obscured after that. No one knows for sure the real truth at all, NO ONE, period. ALL that we know is a lie now, all of it. Be kind, not divisive is all I ask."~

Copy/pasted from my statement, please take note of the very first words "Empirical Science/Sciences" which is what the entire statement is in reference to.

What comes out most is how quick to anger you are & how quick to place anger where there is none.

I'm 71 & have studied The Bible, both canon & extra for most of my life, but still know I need more study. It's as important to listen to God concerning books He chose not to include as those He had included.

Would you prefer the Apocalypse of Peter, where those in Heaven can pray the damned out of Hell & Dante got his Inferno? When they were choosing books, it was more popular than John's Revelation. Or the Gnostic writings like the Gospel of Judas or those that sound as New Age as any in the modern movement? How about the version of Gnostic Christianity that inspired Mohammad? I like the Gospel of Thomas, it could be the Q document. Everyone loves Enoch.

All ancient writings aren't equal. The Gospel we have today saves, Jesus is in it & He shines out. From Yahweh Who walked with Adam to Yeshua our Risen Savior, we see Him.

Find what's right & true.

#JesusisLord

empirical adjective
em·​pir·​i·​cal | im-ˈpir-i-kəl , em-

variants: or less commonly empiric im-​ˈpir-​ik , em-​
Definition of empirical
1: originating in or based on observation or experience
empirical data
2: relying on experience or observation alone often without due regard for system and theory
an empirical basis for the theory
3: capable of being verified or disproved by observation or experiment
empirical laws
4: of or relating to empiricism

See any indication of being carved in stone? Science changes itself as it advances, that's its nature. What I find thrilling is the further Science advances the closer it comes to proving "God did it". The Anthropic Principle even convinced Hawking.

This is a GREAT book!
https://www.amazon.com/Enough-Faith-Atheist-Foreword-Limbaugh-ebook/dp/B0029RJ7D8/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=i+don%27t+have+enough+faith+to+be+an+atheist&qid=1617004473&s=digital-text&sr=1-1

You should walk yourself back there. You can't "change" what I meant and said to fit an angle of debate t& meet the goalposts you are shooting for. I am over 50, I am I'm quite experienced in life in educational materials in a plethora of topics, & know exactly the difference between empirical and consensus science and I don't need you to try to explain it to me.
I also AM NOT AN ATHEIST & you're becoming offensive deliberately now!
You are intentionally trying to be argumentive and that is very rude. I know what I said, I explained what I said, so you are WAY off base & you need to check yourself. You are just talking with a chip on your shoulder daring me to knock it off. I also have decades of experience debating things in my arenas of discussions and beliefs. I am stressing manners as well as practicing them, let's like mutual adults (if you are one) stop this course now before you run this conversation aground. No reply is needed and will consider one provocative now. Good bye

I'm not responsible for how you view what I've said. I'm not angry & I'm not insulting you. Analyze what parts of my statements make you think I am.

#JesusisLord
#GodWins!

You accused me of being led by Satan, accused me of saying the Bible was all lies, suggested I was an Atheist, on and on...I mean really? Go look at my first response and then yours directly below it...YOU misquoted ME left and right and accused me of things based on nothing. Look it is all there to read!
I even clarified what was said in plain text for you and you still are correcting me on MY OWN statements and continue to try and redefine them even now?
Yeah...it is offensive and would be taken so by anyone. You said multiple things by your own hand about me for all to read that truly are indeed offensive and absolutely 100% false!
So yes it is an attack on my character and is slanderous in nature and all based on falsehoods.

"It's not all lies, but the one whispering that to you is."
Copy/pasted from your reply to me...

Are you Ghost Ezra? He's the one who made the original post. Why did you get so upset with a frustrated (not angry) comment by a stranger made to another stranger? The people here are sweet & kind & I appreciate them, why would I insult them?

This is a place for Q-Army, my people, so they're used to hard truths. Q is a truth movement & that's what we've dedicated ourselves to uncovering and presenting to the world. Why do you think Q went worldwide? People everywhere are hungry for the truth, because ONLY the truth can set us free. God is in Truth, not lies, no matter how tempting the lie.

#wwg1wga

#JesusisLord
#GodWins!