πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ All posts are in service to The Republic, not the corporation, of the United States of America.

In case you missed it, here is the very powerful 2.19 post by Scavino which highlights the ripple effect of saving a child...

https://mobile.twitter.com/danscavino/status/1362972374216417281

Esther Rantzen is an odd choice though. Many suspect her involvement with the BBC and the Childline system was designed to filter out reports of child abuse where the elite were accused. This was how the two tier system operated. Naughty Dads and Uncles went to jail. Judges, politicians, royals, celebrities were helped to destroy their accusers in court and receive compensation to boot. It was still the same until recently.

In response JFK Jr Fan to his Publication

Only people mentioned by @ProbablyRob in this post can reply

Student of synchronicity and predictive programming who sometimes says "ε“ˆε“ˆε“ˆε“ˆε“ˆε“ˆε“ˆε“ˆε“ˆε“ˆε“ˆε“ˆε“ˆ" Felixtheblack.Cat

In response Robert Pettitt to his Publication

On second thoughts, Scavino might be highlighting Childline as one of the charities set up to help children which was really doing the opposite. There are plenty of other examples. Perhaps the Clintons are about to be exposed regarding Haiti. That should put the Democrats' BLM in context!

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ All posts are in service to The Republic, not the corporation, of the United States of America.

In response Robert Pettitt to his Publication

I appreciate your consideration of some of the many possible intentions of that tweet.

(1) Show this thread