People are allowed to block you out of their life. A lack of freedom of speech is being banned from the site for stating your (unharmful) opinion. Suspended, exiled, banned from public speech.

However, thinking an individual personally blocking you = messing with your freedom of speech is like saying restraining orders are unconstitutional.

Others can call people out for whining, for being asleep, for being total@sshles, for not seeing the truth, for trolling, etc. etc. etc. That isn't a lack of freedom of speech. That's being called out.

If blocked, the person who blocks wants to save their energy from interacting with someone on such a different mental plane as them (unwilling to actually *LISTEN* to what they've been saying for so long now). There are plenty of others to speak to.

You are free to speak. But not free of the consequences that your speech may bring (such as bridges burned).

I believe that the idea here is that censorship should be an individual's choice to himself rather than a single entity's mandate to everyone.

No.