So I've heard this but can not find proof of this. I can see the correlation between the patent on the vaxs but when put in a human I have not seen proof of this supreme court ruling. It may be out there but it's being hidden. If anyone has more facts on linking these two I'd like to have it.
"Genetically modified mRNA's are legally trans-human" "they do not enjoy any human or other rights as a state""this applies world wide because gen point technology patents are under US jurisdiction and law."
Can someone explain the legal jargon she's using to me in 101.
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/pKaYkp87AzDTBurG/
A memer here to fight for Trump! Banned from Twitter and YT twice each. Took the pledge. WWG1WGA Q 1A/2A PATRIOT Salty Army Savage IFBAP
Its pure bullshit.
There is no such Supreme Court Ruling and that is why they never quote it.
Human Beings cannot be patented period.
There is NO legal definition of the term Transhuman and it is purely philosophically used at this point in time.
The legal definition of a human being, or "person", in the United States includes any infant of the species homo sapiens that is born alive. This means the infant must be completely expelled from the mother and have at least one of the following characteristics: Breathing, Beating heart, Pulsating umbilical cord, and Definite voluntary muscle movement.
This definition applies regardless of whether the infant was born through natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion
Changing one aspect of your body does not alter your status anymore than having a pigs kidney transplanted in to human makes them a pig.
A patent does nothing but protect a patent holders financial investment from infringement.
Looking forward to the day we heal our wounds and live in Peace,Love and Unity as we were meant to.
Okay thank you for sharing. This is what I've been told, or something like this by someone else and it makes sense. I do not know legal jargon so I appreciate your reply.
They're so hard to trust on some things. Just logically it seems impossible to say our body belongs to anyone else for any reason.
That a patent is only to 'protect the Patent holders financial investment from infringement makes sense.'
Break free of the illusion. We are Light! 🌟 Time to soar! 🎶❤💫 Pro: men & women with souls. Unity & peace among us.
While I cannot help you with legal proof because it doesn't interest me that much as I am not vaxed and can't do anything to help those who are I can give you an opinion. I do believe the proof is available as I have seen other people post and talk about this for at least 2 years.
Basically, it comes down to the fact that they put their product in you, which changes your DNA. Because the person no longer has their original human DNA they now legally belong the people that patented that product. (In their crazy minds, I do not endorse this).
Let's hope we never see this go any further.
No proof here either, but have heard the same explanation. Anything that can be generically changed (GMO seeds) can be patented. Nature/natural can not be patented, but if something is changed from original blueprint by man, they stamp it with a patent and barcode.
Looking forward to the day we heal our wounds and live in Peace,Love and Unity as we were meant to.
Yes this is what I feel as well when I put it with what I've seen come to fruition in the past on some things but darn it I want more proof. Because if I can get it we can all start informing ahead of time on it. I don't trust them at all. I've been informing since 2002 when I first found out about vaxs. I was shocked to see all the proof of vax damage and with RFK jr back 20 years ago he was our biggest form of proof but maybe we need to wait longer. There is a part of me that thinks it would be really hard to take a human and have rights over them because of our constitution.
Maybe one day this will be like the vaxs. Thank you for sharing your thoughts with me!
