The supreme court makes decisions on constitutionality only. It doesn't confirm medical results. A basic search proves this is not factual.

In response COMMANDER VALIANTTHOR to his Publication

Only people mentioned by @JustaGardener in this post can reply

๐Ÿ‘€ for truth in all things with the ๐Ÿ‘€ &๐Ÿ‘‚of the holy spirit. Q is the Father's master plan. Jesus is King. Isaiah 11:4-9

In response Justa Gardener to her Publication

Wrong. The U.S. SupremeCourt also hears cases that will set a legal precedent. This creates case law. The highest courts in each state work this way as well.

Wife, Mother, Gigi, Freedom-lover, Nature girl. I hear God best in the garden. And now I see Codes everywhere....

In response TweezleZimm Thomas to her Publication

A law can't "confirm" that medical damage is "irreparable," only that compelling evidence INDICATES such MAY be the case, and therefore, based on that possibility or likelihood, sets a legal precedent for action.

(1) Show this thread