It looks like yesterday it was ruled he must appear on the ballot in MI. This strategy is confusing: first they are "not allowed" on the ballot, they fight the lawfare to get on the ballot and then they announce they are endorsing another candidate. Hopefully someone can explain where this is going.

In response Robert Wakefield to his Publication

Only people mentioned by @Fight_for_Life in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Fight_for_Life , click on at the bottom under it