”THE TWO PUTINS”
~ by Freya Ferdinand II

On to the story...
The original Putin was said to have been deranged mobster and gangster, according to members of the Russian government. He would kill anyone who got in his way or anyone he simply wasn’t a fan of. Everyone around him lived in fear of their lives. Russian officials got together and filed charges against Putin for all the murders he’d committed.

Below, you will see pictures of Putin jailed inside of a courtroom. A#Guilty verdict was quickly handed down and Putin was “swiftly” executed that evening in December 2011, for crimes against humanity and extreme torture of his victims.I first found a video on YouTube of Mrs. Putin claiming the new Putin was not her husband and that he was removed from their home one night in 2010 by Russian officials and he was never seen by her again. A few weeks later, a different man was dropped off to their home and the military tells her the man is her husband. It is clear to her he is not

I noticed that no one in United States was talking about this! However, Russian media, from where I learned of this story, was all abuzz with this information. They knew the Putin we see today was NOT the real Putin and they were celebrating this fact. Why? Because the second Putin—the replacement Putin, was brought in to clean house and clear out Russian corruption, the same exact way Trump was placed in power to do in the great U.S. of A. Coincidence?
Absolutely not! Putin made Russia great again!! He kicked the Deep State out of Russia, although they do still very much exist today, but more so on “fringe” outskirts of Russian and within neighboring countries like Ukraine. Putin kicked “Deep State butt” and Russia has been flourishing for quite some time ever since! According to Russian citizens, Russia is now a safe and decent place to live thanks to Putin 2.0.

In response Robert Wakefield to his Publication

Only people mentioned by @Robertauthor in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Robert Wakefield, click on at the bottom under it