To conceal a conspiracy about fuel usage in airlines; the in and out metering and logs of every fuel pump at every refinery, at every distribution depot, on every truck, and on every aircraft would have to be tampered with (in unison) all around the world. There is no way that has happened.

A trucker can feel the weight of the trailer he's pulling by how the machine responds. A pilot can feel an aircraft's performance as well. Weight and balance is a HUGE thing for aircraft performance and safety.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_747#Specifications

https://www.boeing-747.com/boeing-747-internals/fuel-system.html

(Yes, wiki and Boeing are cabal but these stats are completely generic and confirmable.)

A 60k gal tank is 27.1' in dia. with a sq. footage of: 85.1. At 14.2' tall this gives 1,208 cu ft.

A 747 wing has sq. footage of: 5,960. A ball park guess is that only 70 percent is fuel storage giving: 4,172 sq ft.

A wing would only need to be 3.5' tall.

You make very important points, and conspiracy over this much time is IMPOSSIBLE. I say that to say I have NO IDEA HOW they pulled this ruse off. The Pilots I can understand controlling them, but all the other things involved in air travel that are affected stumps me...

Near the tip a wing is thinner but at the root it is much thicker (and much deeper). Plus, much of the fuel is in the belly, not just the wings.

It all fits. Easily. With room for cargo and passengers.

Aircraft are absolutely incredible feats of engineering. Generations of engineers have refined these ordinary, Newtonian technologies into flying marvels. There is no need to attribute exotic tech to their performance.

This meme is rubbish. I've rebutted it in detail numerous times but people just will not let it go.

There is no hidden tech in airliners.

None.

The pictured tank is much larger than stated and a 747 wing (where most of the fuel is stored) is huge.

I did more digging..there's a ton of diff w/ the density lbs for fuel vs water...Water is abt 8lb/gal & fuel is around 2lbs/gal. So if the max take off for 747 is around 700-900k lb, per the spec below, and 60k fuel, give abt 168k lbs, that would be enough to cover the weight/fuel tank they claim it carries, where ever they put it. Yah in pics they said that it's stored in the wings...but I just cant see how all that weight be stored in the wing span of a plane. It is what it is. Boeing is still a CABAL corporation, hiding/suppressing hidden techs against the PPL, so they can keep making travels un-affordable for the normal/low income ppl. [They] got their punishment fr 45/Q team, bc of what 45 made abt them in past conf & changing out CEOs, prob gitmod for treason/human trafficking involvement, bc they all did, CEOs who were forced to step down.