I’m noticing more patterns, especially within the anon community.
When we first started digging on the boards, no one judged anyone for their opines or digging. No one turned on someone because of an idea.
Now that we are many years into this awakening, the pattern is emerging.
Some anons believe one thing, other anons believe differently.
Everyone agrees there is a plan and that we are in Gods Army. Everyone agrees that this is the fight to end evil and it’s corruption of our world.
However, egos and entitlement are getting in the way of conversation. If anon 1 believes JFK Jr is alive and anon 2 does not, this does not constitute a war on social media for all to see. As anons we have a responsibility to lead the awakening. Fighting over small beliefs that may or may not be the case, does not justify the drama.
Yesterday I really thought one reply was very funny, but I declined to comment, because someone had scolded the person who had the nerve to question a fellow anon.
Yes, the question was impertinent, even slightly disrespectful, but it seemed rather appropriate and indeed, made me laugh.
Asking questions, debating, disagreeing, agreeing- finally or agreeing to disagree- all fine in my eyes.
From Q 4509:
