I don’t write articles about AU or the many plausibly deniable sources around on multiple sites. People have to discover it organically for themselves. I don’t want to be a “Michelin Guide to memers” acting as recommender, and becoming a trust function that substitutes for personal discernment. All of the syncs and proofs are stuff for history books. Amazing how few read pay attention. Some anons are spearheaded material, most are just the shaft.
Why would someone doing good need plausible denialbility
