I have been wondering something for many years and I haven't asked the question because I figured I'd be burned at the stake for even asking, lol. Being that the large nations like Russia for example have nukes, why in all these years, especially in the cold war Era has Russia not used them against us? I know there's an agreement that these nations that have nukes won't us them against each other. Heck, hitler made an agreement with Neville Chamberlain that he wouldn't bomb England, but we know how that worked out. I was just wondering if anyone else wonders this? Sorry if it's a dumb question.

Good morning Sarah! There is no such thing as a dumb question. We have been lied to about EVERYTHING. Nuclear weapons have never existed…another lie [they] use as a fear tactic to control us

You actually believe that nuclear weapons don't exist?

I believe it and I know it

Care to share your proof?

It will be revealed with all the truth about to be declassed. If you like, you can share your proof that they do, I’ll wait

Typical non-proof answer. People who have proof generally like to share it.

I'll start with the fact that nuclear power plants work to generate extreme amounts of heat.

We'll skip the chemistry textbooks about electron valence levels, how Plutonium 239 degrades into uranium 238, or how 238 climbs to 239 in a LMBR, and why cadmium absorbs the loose electrons to control the reaction.

Not all 'science' is a cabal lie. They just hide some and tweak other parts to suit their agenda.

Next, we'll go to Galen Windsor's seminars where he would eat uranium to show that it wasn't as harmful as the government claimed. (I do believe him about the smaller doses being mostly benign.) The point is that he believed in nuclear power.

I'll move on to Operation Fishbowl which is used by FE'ers to claim there is a firmament and Satan was trying to break it. (I'm not a FE'er but do listen to them. They may be right.)

The videos of test blasts on the Bikini Atoll are pretty convincing

Videos online are not trusthworthy at all. Nuclear energy exists, nuclear weapons no. We did a deep dig on that in 2020 and was confirmed on twitter middle of 2021. You may have missed it

So videos on-line can't be trusted...

Where did you get the information for your 'deep dive' then?

On-line?

In that time frame I saw a video purporting to show evidence that Fat Man and Little Boy were actually incendiary bombs, not nuclear. I was intrigued and see it as possible but was not fully convinced. Even if the bombs were only incendiary, it does not prove the non-existence of post WWII discovery.

Anything can be used as a weapon. If nuclear power generates heat, then it can be weaponized. If radiation can be used to kill cancer cells, it can be weaponized. (Arguably it has been by its very use.)

You believe NW's don't exist and write with great confidence but if can't back it up, you shouldn't give others blanket advice.

Chris, it is not moral to mislead sweet old ladies about life and death situations when you don't have proof.

That's my beef.

Have sauce ready or post with a degree of uncertainty.

on most days I'm a sweet lady, at least I think I am..lol. Wonder why it is assumed that I am old and being misled? Do you live under the assumption that old people are dumb? Please, don't be condescending in your assumption that "sweet old ladies" are ignorant and unable to have opinions on subjects you may have a difference of opinion about.
I don't know that I believe the narrative about nuclear bombs. I believe it to be a scare tactic.
I am more inclined to believe that instead of laying waste to everything on earth with a bomb, there has been far more time and money spent on ways to use weapons against our bodies to kill off populations with disease and vaccinations and dirty food and water and things that are sprayed in the air. There are far more ways to kill off whole populations of people than just one as we've seen happening before our eyes. For the record, I'm a Gen-xer..😉

My apologies for any unintended, perceived slight, Sarah. Thank you for calling me out.

My comment to Chris was not intended to be a reflection on you. It was intended to put the significance of his nonchalant, unsupported claim into perspective so that he might gain a little caution and a sense of responsibility for his words. Whether NW exist or not was not my point.

It didn't take.

I would have been very interested in any facts he might have brought forward. His immediate deflection and defensiveness tell a tale.

Interestingly, much of AU is gen x women. I've found them to generally be savvy discerners and savage information warriors.

Mostly I just see anons.

As it should be.