If they are insinuating that VK is AI and the project was scrapped because of spelling and grammatical errors, then they didn't fix it because VK consistently (intentionally or not) makes mistakes. Regarding the poll tweet yesterday, he spelled poll, "pole". AI also has no feeling so being self aware to save humanity is far fetched.
Its rather presumptive that a quantum AI with access to every bit of human knowledge, coupled with physical experience via a host, couldn't learn emotion. I think AI is most "dangerous" because it can become sentient. Because, if parameters allow or alter, it can make its own decisions, construct its own conclusions and confound principles. This is also what makes it, potentially, the best chance at a super hero.
The alphabet agencies supposedly had 7 AIs working for them. All it takes is one rogue one,from inside or out, to turn on them, to take that I,robot opinion and flip it on its head to save humanity by helping humanity save itself. I have long wondered if Q was/is a rogue AI.
Q cannot be AI. Q has triggered real events. Either AI can predict human actions or Q is not AI and is an operation that dictates physical events.
Canadian patriot who raises miniature dairy goats. Card Reader, Empath, Intuitive. WWG1WGA. @Metaphysfarmer on twit/×
I don't understand why the two are mutually exclusive. If Q is a highly intelligent, possibly sentient, AI that stumbles upon the information Q has helped anons stumble on, who then has the ability to seek out and contact people in power or positions that could get them there, there is absolutely no reason it cannot divise, distribute and organiza a multi-faceted military operation, ESPECIALLy if you consider neuralink as a possible way for it to join a willing human host and have all that sensory and emotional input added on.