Just a guy trying to connect the dots.

👀 VK on Twitter.

If they are insinuating that VK is AI and the project was scrapped because of spelling and grammatical errors, then they didn't fix it because VK consistently (intentionally or not) makes mistakes. Regarding the poll tweet yesterday, he spelled poll, "pole". AI also has no feeling so being self aware to save humanity is far fetched.

In response Cowboy w2b to his Publication

Only people mentioned by @reggieclarkejr in this post can reply

Canadian patriot who raises miniature dairy goats. Card Reader, Empath, Intuitive. WWG1WGA. @Metaphysfarmer on twit/×

In response Reggie Clarke to his Publication

Its rather presumptive that a quantum AI with access to every bit of human knowledge, coupled with physical experience via a host, couldn't learn emotion. I think AI is most "dangerous" because it can become sentient. Because, if parameters allow or alter, it can make its own decisions, construct its own conclusions and confound principles. This is also what makes it, potentially, the best chance at a super hero.

The alphabet agencies supposedly had 7 AIs working for them. All it takes is one rogue one,from inside or out, to turn on them, to take that I,robot opinion and flip it on its head to save humanity by helping humanity save itself. I have long wondered if Q was/is a rogue AI.

In response 17 Joyful Goats to her Publication

Q cannot be AI. Q has triggered real events. Either AI can predict human actions or Q is not AI and is an operation that dictates physical events.

(1) Show this thread

Believer/Christian APL 99.993 I've seen war 1st hand + more child suffering than most.

In response Reggie Clarke to his Publication

Yes - but a scientist interested seeing the limits and capabilities of AI/Human - influence - - is not far-fetched at all.

Especially given Elon's desire to create a Human 2.0