![](https://v2.anonup.com/upload/avatars/2022/09/jT5FhDaaPyWpxfpW2V2t_26_9bf94b9e23f830fd6939be2cbdd59181_thumbnail_512x512.jpg)
#FamilyIsEverything. APL = 7.1/10 *Authorized conspiracy theorist *Not an authorized preacher.
Anyone have that video clip of Klaus Schwab mentioning some legal ramifications of getting the vaccine? Alluding to Vaxxed could be considered property theory.
![](https://v2.anonup.com/upload/avatars/2022/09/jT5FhDaaPyWpxfpW2V2t_26_9bf94b9e23f830fd6939be2cbdd59181_thumbnail_512x512.jpg)
#FamilyIsEverything. APL = 7.1/10 *Authorized conspiracy theorist *Not an authorized preacher.
SCOTUS 12-398 Supreme Court ruling ‘Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v Myriad Genetics, inc., et al.’
The ruling prohibited patents on naturally occurring human genes but allowed legal protections on synthetically produced genetic material
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-genes-idUSBRE95C0PW20130613
U.S. top court bars patents on human genes unless synthetic | Reuters
A unanimous U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday prohibited patents on naturally occurring human genes but allowed legal protections on synthetically produced genetic material in a compromise ruling hailed as a partial victory for patients and the biotechnology industry.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-genes-idUSBRE95C0PW20130613