ONLY ON ANONUP AND TWITTER. I AM NOT ON TELEGRAM OR ANYWHERE ELSE.
Pretty sure he is an anon... been disparaged for 20 years by mainstream science. I've followed him off an on for awhile and I do not think he is purposefully misleading if he is wrong and I think his theories are at least plausible. He is also very forthcoming on psychedelics.@KimRunner and I were talking about this exact thing about Hancock last week.
ONLY ON ANONUP AND TWITTER. I AM NOT ON TELEGRAM OR ANYWHERE ELSE.
In response Moultrie Patriot to his Publication
My alarm turns on whenever something is pushed by Netflix or someone like@jack. Let's wait and see.
In response Johnny Q -Z to his Publication
agree on both! Not sure Jack is ‘Jack’ any longer but we will see!