So let me get this straight, Simon Parks has a clause in his NDA that allows him to disclose information on upcoming ops his NDA states he can not disclose, as long as he discloses it with 5 other untrue ops?

sounds more like he took the top 6 talking points from other peoples’ work and created an elaborate story for it, then can claim he was right if any, or in part were close to being correct…

i can hear him already… “See, i told you i was right!” “They had to change up the op a little last minute.”

Funny

You won’t get me into an argument about Simon Parkes. I am not defending him nor do I care what others think of him.

There was a point to my post that has nothing to do with Simon Parkes.

Do you know what my point is? I am genuinely asking (no sarcasm at all).

I think number 3.

That would be one of the easier options to accept, but we have a gut punch coming.

A fraudulent blue wave (option 5) - as unthinkable as that is - would be a huge gut punch. I don’t think a fake alien invasion or a nuclear war are in the works.

The mid-terms are being allowed to proceed (my belief) and the Cabal is going to be allowed - again - to do their dirty cheating game.

It will SEEM like the Demon-crats have total control of both houses and the Presidency.

All we can do is pray that there are White Hats, that they really are in control, and that the
Military White Hats uphold their oaths and step in (they will, but they won’t until we have felt enough pain and we finally stand up ourselves).

Also Simon Parkes claimed that he was in telephone contact with the Q Team. Q made it very clear that there were NO outside coms from the board. Simon Parkes and his side kick "Dr" Charlie Ward are both Charlatans. You only have to search them both using google to find out they are opportunist scammers. I have been in the Q movement from the first post and I have seen folks come and go and these 2 suddenly appeared out of no where in 2020. I first got exposed to Charlie Ward when he did the Hidden King scam.

Agreed.

I presented the scenarios because - irrespective of who communicated them - they are all plausible.

My personal opinion is that the 5th option - which is the darkest and most demoralizing- is the one that plays out.

Simon Parkes was NOT the focus of my post. I don’t understand why people stop reading after they see “Simon Parkes.”

I was VERY clear. I know that many don’t think much of Simon Parkes (I am NOT defending, promoting or denegrating the man).

You do understand the purpose of my post? I am genuinely asking (no sarcasm at all).

yes i saw this vdeo this morning.
i dont know which door to take...

Quite a quandry indeed. I know the scenario I WANT to play out, but my heart tells me that it will be the darkest one (option 5) - because it will be the most impactful. It will, I believe, also be the one that unites humanity ultimately. This scenario will make it abundantly clear who has really been running our world.

We will NEVER forget the events of the coming week.

Whatever comes, we have God, Jesus and each other. How can we ultimately lose?