I just read the bill. I was thinking it was HUGE. The military isn't mentioned at all and it didn't read like that at all. I think the ethics section is relevant ( mentions conflicts of interest and we KNOW the Bidens have plenty of THOSE). But this bill does but have any language to back up the military control ( or ANY control). I know that Trump/military is in control but this bill doesn't appear to be the proof of that!

In response 1776 ... to his Publication

Only people mentioned by @Marywwg1 in this post can reply

Empath. BA in ministry. Mental Health Advocate. Don't tread. Libertarian. Conservative where it counts. Pics-mine. MTN time, USA.

In response Mary Qqqq to her Publication

I dug into it, too. I went to 1963 to look at the original as the 2019 version does not speak to military. However, I am wondering if possibly it received an addition of military text between '63 and 2019.