New favorite acronym = SMU

In response Kim Runner to her Publication

Haha! Deep, Straight! Howd I miss this?!

Curious Patriot πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ. Crass humor appreciate 🀣. Cursive language warning ⚠️. F.-A.-F.-O. Hall of Fame πŸ†. Gemini β™Š. Type -O β›”. T.I. πŸš”.

In response Bleachey Bleach to his Publication

: DEEP: STRAIGHT IS WITH THE [AB]SOLUTELY-CORRECT BY THIS POSTMASTER'S-WITNESSING-CLAIM. (This mutherfukers a C.-I.-A. plant, he will help you get to federal prison, about it tho..)

david straight is the real deal, been to two of his seminars, he knows what hes talking about.

Curious Patriot πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ. Crass humor appreciate 🀣. Cursive language warning ⚠️. F.-A.-F.-O. Hall of Fame πŸ†. Gemini β™Š. Type -O β›”. T.I. πŸš”.

In response Cabal Crusher to his Publication

Have you ever successfully utilized any of his mechanics?!? You don’t have to answer that, but I already know the answer. I wasn't just throwing shade/player hating for no reason. I have intel on my claim, plus I am exactly who I say I am. Enough said.

Then lets have your intel ... if you're going to make a claim then show us why you're making that claim .... its not just SMU

Curious Patriot πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ. Crass humor appreciate 🀣. Cursive language warning ⚠️. F.-A.-F.-O. Hall of Fame πŸ†. Gemini β™Š. Type -O β›”. T.I. πŸš”.

Only people mentioned by @akalaurel in this post can reply

Curious Patriot πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ. Crass humor appreciate 🀣. Cursive language warning ⚠️. F.-A.-F.-O. Hall of Fame πŸ†. Gemini β™Š. Type -O β›”. T.I. πŸš”.

[I spent the weekend with Russell in Phoenix, just a couple days prior to this video-publication. The question of Straight's validity was brought up by another Postmaster. The claim of his CIA involvement came straight from the horses mouth. My void-closure-contract stops me from quoting verbatim, so this is my witnessing fact. The connection is, you need to be the TONE-SETTER! Straight's "teachings" of asking the fiction permission, in fiction grammar & with a fictional contract is counter-productive to being truly Sovereign. Food for thought.]

ok, but that's a pretty vague description of validity.
No matter ... I've never seen any evidence that DS was Cia

(1) Show this thread