At what point do you say to yourself these f were willing to vaccinate children with mind control nanoparticles regardless of the oxidative stress side effects?

I would probably say that to myself when the probability of it being true reached near 100%. I haven't looked at enough evidence of the nanoparticles to know either way. I haven't seen "nanoparticle" in the ingredients, so I need to learn more about it, but the mRNA is also concerning.

In response The Mac to his Publication

Only people mentioned by @4dBender in this post can reply

Given everything you now know about vaxxines go back & watch the Documentaries Vaxxed 1&2. Autism is a fate worse than death

RFID Nano Chips and licensing for use in humans approved in the US since 2004

https://patents.google.com/patent/US7777631B2/en

https://patents.justia.com/patent/10327644

Given everything you now know about vaxxines go back & watch the Documentaries Vaxxed 1&2. Autism is a fate worse than death

Pfizer 'N' Tech. Clue is in the name N = Nano

Given everything you now know about vaxxines go back & watch the Documentaries Vaxxed 1&2. Autism is a fate worse than death

In response BLACK SHEEP to his Publication
(1) Show this thread
In response The Mac to his Publication

Here is Pfizer and BioNTech Lipid Nanoparticle, ALC-0315.

Off topic, but interesting note that this line says the more acidic certain cells in the body are, the more mRNA payload is delivered.

"the more acidic environment within the endosome fully protonates the ALC-0315 as a result the nanoparticle releases its payload of mRNA"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALC-0315

In response The Mac to his Publication

An article on Remote controlled nanoparticles. It looks like these contain iron wrapped in an oleic acid, and release a payload, drug or mRNA, in response to a certain radio frequency.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1/articles/PMC4669063/

(2) Show this thread