Information archaeologist 🧐 Finding truth one dig at a time
The best way???
By responding with a string of obscenities in abbreviated form?
By the "followers" shutting down any discourse by labeling the offending commentor a shill and a troll?
Shutting down discourse is the fingerprint of the enemy, or have you all forgotten?
WE WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO KNOW BETTER are emulating the unawakened by blindly following.
We are tasked with being "Watchmen on the wall" which involves careful observation, gathering facts, and analyzing what we've gathered through our sense of discernment.
Even one big red flag is enough for me to place someone in my "Hmmm" file. Usually where there's smoke there's fire 🔥.
BLIND TRUST in people who are in positions of authority is what got us in this mess to begin with. 😶
Anyone can say anything; it doesn't make it true. 🤨
Just like --
"The dog ate my homework"
"the check is in the mail" and
"I'll still love you in the morning."
🧐
Believer/Christian APL 99.993 I've seen war 1st hand + more child suffering than most.
You expect military personal not to fight when engaged?
Information archaeologist 🧐 Finding truth one dig at a time
Responding to an accusation by simply saying "F**k you" rather than giving an argument against the accusation is not fighting back. On the contrary -- it's running away.
Believer/Christian APL 99.993 I've seen war 1st hand + more child suffering than most.
He is promoting conferences around America - that have 2 - 12 hour (minimum) - days of speaking talking directly about election results.
He is centered, compassionate honest and direct.
The people who refuse to follow the actual news are simply lazy.
I get detailed emails from Sidney Powell several days a week.
Mike Lindell has a whole entire website devoted to election news
Stew Peters reports on the pandemic and election daily.
I post some of the info from those articles.
The battles are ongoing.
General Flynn has lived and breathed and absorbed every aspect of this since the election and if people are TOO stupid to have observed that detail - I can't help them.
I hear the same reasoning from "normies" --
"CNN, MSNBC NY Times, & FOX all said the same about ..... (fill in the blank).
That's not analysis.
Analysis is picking up on subtle clues that give indication of what you're dealing with.
Discernment also plays an important role.
If you smell smoke, it needs to be investigated, because it could become a destructive fire.
And one who resorts to name calling has been triggered and cannot share ideas rationally.
