Hey, NYT... 👊💥
"Nagourney never actually attempts to evaluate the science. Instead, Nagourney interviewed RFK Jr.’s relatives. That’s bizarre. Nagourney is making a SOCIAL argument in an attempt to rebut RFK, Jr.’s SCIENTIFIC arguments. ...
It literally never occurs to the bourgeoisie that one could evaluate the evidence for oneself and make an argument on the merits. Bourgeois’ arguments are ENTIRELY SOCIAL, their worldview consists of figuring out how to fit in and not make waves.
And that’s one reason why the bourgeoisie has gotten everything wrong about coronavirus from the beginning — they never actually evaluate data, they are trapped inside an epistemology that considers social standing the only valid form of evidence.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/ny-times-another-hit-piece-rfk-jr/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=cf7e950c-f8c5-4b6f-a297-3df709818651
NY Times Ran Another Hit Piece on RFK, Jr. It's Time to Hit Back. • Children's Health Defense
The New York Times ran a front-page, 2,600-word hit piece on Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Saturday. It’s time for us to hit back by emailing The Times and help set the record straight.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/ny-times-another-hit-piece-rfk-jr/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=cf7e950c-f8c5-4b6f-a297-3df709818651Yes, indeed he should get more attention for what he’s done! 🙏🏻 I’m certainly thankful for him and his work!
Q from the 1st drop! JohnFKennnedy JR followed me on Twitter, @RealDonaldTrump=RealPresidentof USA‼️🇺🇸PRINCE 4 Eva💋☔️☔️☔️🏎🏎💟☮️💜