Juan O Savin

“The Law of War Manual was put together
under the Trump Administration.
It was taking concepts & ideas
that existed in some cases, for centuries:
The Rules of War Between Nations
& what authorized certain actions..
there have been addendums based on what happened
with the Nuremberg Trials
Military Tribunals, etc.
as well as the Executive Level & Civilian Courts.
There are certain rules..
that determine what things can & should be prosecuted
in a Criminal court, a Civil court or a Military Court
& what those criteria are with exacting precision..
Would the Revolutionaries at the beginning of our Nation
when they begin to break away
from our British Masters, the Royals,
would they today have been justified 💥 LEGALLY?..
IF those Revolutionaries had violated
certain LAW OF WAR precepts
then all these years later..
other parties, be it England or other places,
could technically bring a suit
that would overturn what was done.." 💥

Unlike the DS, we follow the law, they do NOT follow the rule of law as we have seen so many many times

You're so right, Mare.
Legally, legally, legally.
Juan O Savin is getting us ready for the next phase:
Courts.
Be it Military, Civil, Executive or at the Hague.
He's urging us to ALL READ
The Dept. of Defense Law of War Manual.
A number of Q posts go back to it 🙏🇺🇸🕊️

Reposting the link for any interested in the pdf
👇 Dept. of Defense LAW OF WAR MANUAL

https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf?ver=2016-12-13-172036-190