Interesting report that Dr. Peter McCollough identifies which suggests the risk of ☠️ from the 💉 is greater than the risk of ☠️ from the 🦠. Essentially, it offers such little protection vs. those who didn't get it (absolute risk reduction), that the number of adverse reactions offsets any "benefit".
JOURNAL LINK: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221475002100161X
Note that the article is focused around children, but Dr. McCollough suggests that the phenomenon is present across all age groups.
Check my math. This video below mirrors what the journal suggests. It uses some old data (the V A E R S numbers + total people with the jab is higher), but the premise is the same since the recovery rate is still ~99%. Also, the ARR for the jab has dropped, I'd imagine.
FYI: the NNV = 1 / ARR.
