Thanks for the clarification. What is your opinion on companies, hospitals, etc. that are requiring employees to have the experimental shot in order to remain employed? Of course, ethically an employee should have the freedom to refuse without losing a job. Many people have been citing the Nuremberg Code as a possible protection for employee jobs, but it seems that is incorrect as vax refusal is an option/not forced (although employment is lost upon refusal.) Thoughts?

Private ownership. A business can refuse to employ or serve anyone they feel is a threat to the continuation of said business. Medical anything receives funding through governmental grants and private donations. If the donors think said medical facility is not a team player donations stop. Donations stop business goes bust. Many of those donors have stock in medical companies like pharma and medical supply. Do you see where I'm going? Non medical businesses depend on HUGE businesses to buy from them, if that business isn't a team player the same thing happens to them. Who owns all the HUGE businesses? The same people that own big pharma and medical supplies. 5x5? This sucky way of doing things was rubber stamped and we were suckered in by a lone bakery refusing to serve a gay couple. Remember that? Laws were passed so that they could refuse. Those laws now protect the enemy.

Based on the code, one has to have INFORMED CONSENT which seems to be lacking as most people I speak to have no idea they are participating in an experiment, how long they are in that experiment or hazards of being involved in the experiment.

http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/

The VOLUNTARY CONSENT of the human subject is absolutely essential. .... and should have ▶▶▶ SUFFICIENT KNOWLEDGE and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. ▶▶▶ This latter element requires that BEFORE THE ACCEPTANCE of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

Lines 4, 6 and 10 also.

In addition, the vaccine has been tested on mice and monkeys with 100% fatality. This is not an experiment. This is a bioweapon that specific people are profitting from while people die.

I just did another post that addresses most of what you just talked about here.