Not sure if I'm reading this correctly or not can someone else take a look and let me know. From what I'm reading they tested the sars cov 2 virus with a brown bats dna and found that it was not replicating during testing. So if it wasn't replicating during testing and it wasn't susceptible to the virus it couldn't have come from a bat like everyone keeps claiming??? here is the excerpt the entire article link in bottom for viewing pleasure.

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article

In response Truth Seeker to her Publication

Only people mentioned by @J_87 in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Truth Seeker, click on at the bottom under it