Brit, Ex Forces. President Trump/Patriots/Anon Supporter. Love travelling, wildlife & so much more. God Bless.
MelQ.
Anons knew...
Chinese military scientist 'filed a patent for a COVID-19 vaccine BEFORE the virus was declared a global pandemic and worked closely with 'bat woman' at Wuhan institute'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9658235/amp/Chinese-scientist-filed-patent-COVID-vaccine-virus-declared-global-pandemic.html
By the end of February 2020 there were 80k cases in China, and that's just the official number.
Doesn't have to be formally acknowledged as a global pandemic to be serious enough to look for treatments.
Also, if you know how patents work, you know that a patent being filed does not mean the solution actually works, has been implemented or even tested.
Look at the stupid patents that tech mega corps file regularly that end up nowhere.
Brit, Ex Forces. President Trump/Patriots/Anon Supporter. Love travelling, wildlife & so much more. God Bless.
so you acknowledge that covid 19 came from the lab, patented and not a bat?
Brit, Ex Forces. President Trump/Patriots/Anon Supporter. Love travelling, wildlife & so much more. God Bless.
so you say. but who are you? can you patent a natural occurrence? YOU don't appear to understand the significance of the presence of a patent. it rules out naturally occurring virus, thank you, adieu.
Your post says a patent for a vaccine was filed.
Which is very different from a patent for a virus being granted.
First of all, anyone can file a patent for anything. You could file a patent for whatever stupid idea you had in a dream or while taking a hot shower. They just wouldn't be granted unless they match a few criteria.
Second of all, filing for something that could prove an effective treatment is different from trying to patent the virus itself. You can't patent water, but you could file a patent for a novel method to desalinate water, for example.
And you could file all those patents without ever making an attempt to prove that it works. Without prototype. Without any substance backing the claim that it does what you say it does.
A patent application is just the enterprise version of putting out a mildly interesting tweet. It might age well. It might not. It's just there so you can point to it and go "See? I was there first" in case it does.
again you miss the TOTAL point, whilst proving mine and the other anons. I'll write it so you understand. COVID19-SARS2 EXISTED long before the CHINA patent. Therefore does not fit the narrative of coming from bats, connect the dots, so stop trying to be the smart arse you clearly are not. People need to be walked back, to get to what we have researched and is available.
I'll write it so YOU understand:
Even if that was the case. The patent application, your post, does not speak for or against it, because it is insignificant and meaningless.
Your point of view may very well be valid and true, but this thing you make out to be proof for it is, indeed, not.
If your point of view is as valid as you think it is, you shouldn't have to rely on fluff like this as "proof".
