Because (GOD), (COUNTRY) no further explanation needed!

Dinesh D’Souza, [23.05.21 11:05]
The MASSIVE Implications of Fauci's New Admission

WATCH: https://youtu.be/w5VMjaxnM5o

The MASSIVE Implications of Fauci's New Admission - YouTube

Dr. Fauci now admits that Covid-19 might have come from the Wuhan lab. Here are the implications of his stunning change of heart on this.—Dinesh D'Souza is a...

Veteran, Constitutional Law, Equality. Restore Our Rights & Constitutional Laws • On TS as TheStormIsUponUs @TheStormIsUponUs

In response Lisa Hill to her Publication

Fauci can play like he doesn’t know with people that do not know Fauci was conducting illegal research in the US Specifically in his R&D Laboratory in North Carolina for years up unto moving all the work to the Wuhan Laboratory in 2014. It is a 100% man made virus and Fauci even had funding sent to the Wuhan Virology Department R&D Center. All blame is to begin with Anthony Fauci and I will not include the word Doctor as he violated US Law regarding research on viruses and modifications to them. He also violated his Hypocratic Oath and should lose the Title Doctor. This was and is criminal in what he has done. He is what we refer to as an Educated Derelict of Society and the motive was Greed and it was and is illegal to have conducted this Research and Development in the USA.
Definition of derelict (Entry 1 of 2)
1 : abandoned

2 : lacking a sense of duty : NEGLIGENT
derelict in his duty.
We have to many complacent educated derelicts in our Society.

Don't just concentrate on the modified Coronavirus bioweapons. Alone, these would not have achieved the main aim of the criminal cabal with regard to killing the "useless eaters". The (fake, slowly lethal) "vaccinations" are the key to a successful global genocide, and were no doubt prepared and tested in parallel with the triggering (hyped up) virus strains.

Only people mentioned by @ProbablyRob in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Robert Pettitt, click on at the bottom under it