Please correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t the normal progression of a new drug before it is released to the general public to 1st have animal testing and only if they are getting the results desired are they allowed to progress to human testing?
If this is correct, wouldn’t the current circumstances suggest that the animal deaths were a desired result and now their human testing phase is under way, further implying that death in humans is what they want?
Patriot Soapmaker; Proverbs 31 woman; Trump Supporter. Popcorn, hell; bring out the Qake! Pit bull mama Banned 17 times from Twatter...
This is standard procedure, just as you described, ma'am.
They have done many attempts at a vax for flu "viruses" before; however, ALL of the test animals have always died, whether ferrets or mice or baby pigs.
They already KNOW the results of animal testing for this type of product. What they're counting on is that WE the PEOPLE are not smart enough to research previous vaccine trials, etc. & discover for ourselves that they have bypassed animal testing BECAUSE they already know the result.
BECAUSE, you can't get people to scramble & line up for a "vaccine" of a type that has, to date, KILLED 100% OF ANIMALS IN CLINICAL TRIALS.
That's the part you can't do - INFORMED CONSENT.
Ironic, isn't it?
What an IQ test - to take the shot or not.
It can be difficult, sometimes, to get people to line up to be STERILIZED & EUTHANIZED...
I called it from the get-go.
Either you pass the IQ test or you don't.
Those who failed won't make it past next winter.