Tom Woods 26 March:

YouTube keeps removing information people need about the virus, as we know, but now the 𝘞𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘚𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘦𝘵 𝘑𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭 , rather a significant platform, is blasting them for it.

The most recent example comes in the form of an article by Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford, who later this week will once again be my guest on the Tom Woods Show.

Bhattacharya writes about the panel of scientists advising Ron DeSantis, governor of Florida, and the roundtable discussion they recently had that YouTube decided needed to be hidden from the public.

The other panelists were Sunetra Gupta of Oxford, Martin Kulldorff of Harvard and Scott Atlas of Stanford.

Writes Bhattacharya:

{𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘦𝘴, 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘺 4 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘴.}

𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘬 𝘠𝘰𝘶𝘛𝘶𝘣𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘺 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘸𝘦𝘣𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘦. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘥 𝘮𝘺 𝘧𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘰𝘸 𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘭 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘐 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘴𝘢𝘪𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘰 "𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘦𝘥 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘶𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘭𝘰𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘨𝘭𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘭 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘩 𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘤𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘬𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘊𝘖𝘝𝘐𝘋-19."

𝘠𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘬𝘦 𝘢𝘨𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘸𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘬𝘴.

{𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘦𝘴, 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘺 3 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘴.}

𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤 𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳. 𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘢 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘺 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘐𝘤𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘺 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘱𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘤 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘯. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘺 𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘊𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘴 𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘤𝘵-𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘥𝘴 𝘱𝘢𝘪𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘤 𝘴𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘺𝘴𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘴𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘶𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘺, 𝘒𝘢𝘳𝘪 𝘚𝘵𝘦𝘧𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘯, 𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘰𝘭𝘥 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 "𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘧 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘯 𝘥𝘰 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘥, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘮𝘪𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘥𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘴. {𝘊𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘦𝘴, 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘺 2 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘴.}